Deda: If LDK and VV don't enter the elections together, they will win PDK

Former Parliament President Ilir Deda has said that more important is the country's substantial change than who should be prime minister. Deda has written that the PDK can surprise us again if there is no pre-election coalition between LDK and VV. "Let's not forget that there somewhere, in silence, is [...]
Deda has written that the PDK can surprise us again if there is no pre-election coalition between LDK and VV.
The “not to forget that there somewhere, in silence, is the PDK. In 2010 The PDK engineer “industrial age” of the vote and “won” in the election; in 2014 it easily won 30%, although in polls it turned out it would get 22%; by 2017 at midnight the PAN was created. And the PDK can surprise us again now on August 30th, when pre-election coalitions” are declared, the Deda wrote.
He has said that change can happen only if Vjosa and Albin are on a list.
The October 6th change only happens if Vjosa and Albin are on a list. If the VVF's LDK came out separate in the elections, all of us are seeing the damaging potential of mutual accusations (which would intensify after August 30th) and result in lower appearances in the election of people who are for change of”, Deda wrote.
Deda has written that LDK and VV must find solutions, so that the prime minister's post is not a split point.
“The VV's LDK must deomo find solutions so that the candidate position for prime minister is not due to the lost potential for the big change of”, Deda wrote.
Here is full status:
“COMM SOVA CHANGE” VS. “K TAKON RISKER V I'm sorry.
In recent days we are witnessing a battle within the opposition voter Corps of who is best, Vjosa or Albini. This mutual opposition delay would be normal if the October 6th elections were only a contest between the LDK and the VV. But since only two parties -- the VV's LDK -- will not participate in the elections, then the question arises: Is the substantial change (united in a pre-election list) or the loss of the opportunity for this change (the return of the opposition split in the election) due to the candidate name for prime minister in the election?
Let's not forget that there, in silence, is the PDK. In 2010 The PDK engineer “industrialised” of the vote and “won” in the election; in 2014 it easily won 30%, even though in polls it turned out it would get 22%; by 2017 at midnight the PAN was created. And the PDK can surprise us again on August 30th when pre-election coalitions are declared.
Over the past decade, opportunities for change lost because opposition parties could not unite. Can anyone really believe that with similar action the opposition can achieve further results in the October 6th elections?
The October 6th change is only if Vjosa and Albin are on a list. If the VVF's LDK came out split in the election, we are all seeing the damaging potential of mutual accusations (which would intensify after August 30th) and result in lower exits in the election of people who are for change.
The VVV's LDK should certainly find solutions that the candidate position for prime minister is not due to the lost potential for major change.
Today we have the historic possibility of change, not after two or four years. Nearly a decade has been lost to reach the point where the cooperation of democratic forces is seen as key to our country. But if there's not a creative opportunity for cutting off the candidate position for prime minister, we'll all be losers. Not only losers, but only responsibilities for not changing.
(Continues)










