It becomes clear who stole and distributed wiretapping in Albania

Indices are clear, the guilty is now easily identifiable. If we were to do journalism according to the same standards that the current opposition applies, based solely on perceptions, we would have no doubt: wiretapping”339” and”1884x3> stole them from Prosecutor Besim Hajdarmaj before moving and [...]
If the prosecution truly has the will to find out who has betrayed the professional secret and given the Democratic Party original audio surveillance, which is included in the two famous”339” and”184x3>, it now has the open road. German journalist Peter Tiede has received the wiretaps, coming from both files copied in the same identical way, so it is clear that surveillance comes from the same source. And this is the first indicator. The second major Indices are raised by a question: which prosecutors have both had files together? And here the circle narrows to just two names: Besimi Hajdarmataj, who was head of the State Criminals Prosecutor at the time when the wiretapping occurred, so he could receive their copies without a problem, and the Adriatic Lylla, who at the same time was the chief prosecutor. The two files have been followed by various prosecutors, so it is impossible to believe that two different prosecutors could act on the same strategy and give the stolen material the same person.
Third Indicator: But between Hajdarat and Lla, who had a political interest in taping? We should remember that he knew that Haydarataj was connected to the PD, while Lolla knew she was connected to the LSI. The circle is further narrowed, since in 2016, Debar LSI participated in the election with the Socialist Party, so to spy out the Socialists, it would mean hurting Ilir Meta's party as well.
If we were to do journalism according to the same standards the current opposition applies, based solely on perceptions, we would have no doubt: wiretapping 339 and 184 stole them from Prosecutor Besim Hajdamataj before moving and he handed them over to the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party for several months used them incorrectly, in some political statements, to the decision to make it public, entrusting the first copies of its court to Albanian journalists. But by bringing them into Albanian media only, it did not bring a huge impact, so to increase credibility, it gave the press orders to publish them in international media.
He first met the Voice of America, which he accepted only once (on the basis of a contract he had with BIRN) and has since refused to be used for political maneuvers again. And so did Peter Tiede. The DP translated the wiretapping into English and entrusted it to German journalist on the opposition's political agenda. And Tiede, without understanding a single word of what he published, agreed to stay in the game, winning in exchange for some fame in Albania.
If we were to act as the opposition does, we would ask that Hajdarmataj be arrested because what he did as a prosecutor is very serious. But since we are all for guaranteeing rights, we believe that even in the case of Hajdarataj it is up to the prosecution to find out the real one. But the indicators are clear, the guilty is easily identifiable. Justice awaits justice. Albanian.










