Haradinaj accuses Kurti of energy failure: Where are thermal power plants and strategic investments?
3 minutes agoThe Constitution refused the request of the Demak brothers
Periskopi(7 years ago)
(7 years ago)At the review hearing held on November 13th 2019, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kosovo also reviewed, among other things, the case presented by Zeqir Demaku, Jahir Demaku, Fadil Demaku, Nexhat Demaku, Isni Thaci, Demaj Union, Selman Demaj, Dritton Demaj and Agim Demaj. The object of the question of demand was to assess the constitutionality of [the...] bias.
At the review hearing held on November 13th 2019, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kosovo also reviewed, among other things, the case presented by Zeqir Demaku, Jahir Demaku, Fadil Demaku, Nexhat Demaku, Isni Thaci, Demaj Union, Selman Demaj, Dritton Demaj and Agim Demaj.
The subject of the demand case was the assessment of the constitutionality of the act of the Supreme Court of Kosovo [Pml.n.158/2018], of September 26th 2018, with which the forgers of the motion claimed that the guaranteed rights to Article 24 [Barazia pre-law] were violated, Article 31 [right and impartial] the right to the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo, concerning Article 6 (the right to a fair process) of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights, as well as the 53 [E of human rights to the constitution].
Request Backers KI 176/18 also claimed that the Supreme Court, with a controversial ruling, has violated the S.S. its guaranteed right to Article 29 [the right to freedom and security] of the Constitution. Request Backers KI 176/18 sought simultaneously by the Constitutional Court to impose temporary measures, however, “to prevent the execution of the controversial” decision. Request Backers KI 06/19 also requested by the Court to impose temporary measures, respectively, to make “the implementation of the execution procedure of sentences by the Constitutional Court in Mitrovice in the numbered classes Did: 123, 125, 126 and 127, until the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kosovo is established.
The requirements were based on Article 113, paragraph 7 [Juridiscition and authorised parties] of the Constitution, on Article 22 [Requisition Process], 27 [the provisional measures], and 47 [witty requests] of the Law for the Constitutional Court. 03 L-121, as well as rule 32 [Preparation of requests and responses] and 56 [Exercise for interim measure] of Constitutional Court work regulation
The court, with the court's unanimous rulings and in accordance with Article 113.7 of the Constitutional Court, with Article 20 of the Constitutional Court, and with rules 39 concerned1), 39552) and 59ew2 of the work regulation, decided to declare the motion unacceptable.
The court decided to reject the provisional motion in accordance with Article 27 of the Constitutional Court Law and the 57th rule of labour regulation.
