Sosa Jashari: More important than the person who signed it

Kosovo has proposed since 2014 that four new topics, including participation in the former Yugoslavia's assets, be discussed in dialogue with Serbia under international law. The question of the wealth of the former Yugoslavia belonging to Kosovo should be addressed by experts rather than politicians, said Sousa Jashari, connoisseur and [...]
The question of the wealth of the former Yugoslavia belonging to Kosovo should be addressed by experts rather than politicians, said Sorusha Jashari, connoisseur of political circumstances in the country, for Online Economy.
Yasar, who has been one of Kosovo's two main politicians during 1986-88, said that in the final phase of the dialogue, the country's sovereignty should be preserved, and then open up such issues that must be taken into account because they may have consequences later.
For this problem, experts need to be engaged, we have experts, but unfortunately, this current policy thinks that all is in their hands and that power is only with speech and power is just required, no more power than document and argument there is no. So I have remarks that there are no experts on this property issue that we have experts who can make a lot of contributions. There are some things that open up later, but if we don't appreciate it right now it's gonna cost us later. It's me there that Kosovo needs to get to the end of dialogue as a problem to preserve sovereignty”, she said.
According to her, you can't even go any further unless the final agreement between the two countries is reached.
“I don't believe that it can go any further unless the final agreement is reached, that the final agreement needs to be clarified by the two states and then comes in a day from wealth, started by the will of other economic problems is not only property”.
Weeks ago, President Hashim Thaci and Serbian President Aleksandar Vuciq have met in Brussels, in which they discussed the final phase of dialogue between the two countries.
In spite of that, reconciliation over the platform and dialogue has yet to be reached in Kosovo, which, although sent for approval to the Assembly, has been drawn back by the prime minister.
Failure to reach consensus on dialogue, Jashari considers it unnecessary. She even demanded that parties put the country's interests ahead of their own.
The parties further need to burden themselves on the second row, the first row is all together for an agreement that does not violate Kosovo. Consensus is definitely needed because it is the moment of responsibility that is not now the party's moment of which is the most supportive party or less”.
The lack of consensus had forced executive leader Ramush Haradinaj to withdraw the platform, which would have mandated the president as chief negotiator of dialogue with Serbia, after sending to the Assembly.
On this issue, the former Kosovo Assembly delegation has said that if the dialogue leadership is not entrusted to the president as a person then the Parliament should take over this issue.
The “is not believed in him as a person, but who is calling to Brussels for the meetings with Vucinqiqi, Hashim is called but is chairman, they cannot ask for an answer. If your credibility is lost, you need the Parliament to also take over the acceptance of the deal eventually if it comes to an agreement on reconciliation between Belgrade and us, then the Assembly should approve after the adoption of”.
Even more important is the agreement reached between the two countries than the person who signed it.











