Six serious medical lies you can die of

In recent years, we have floods of absolutely non - scientific myths that claim that white is black, that vaccine causes autism, some of the most serious diseases can be treated with crystals and similar alchemy miracles.

Here we have some examples of medical myths and we find out what the truth is and what's true medical news, it broadcasts Kosovas.

1. Early vaccine causes autism

Myth

British Gastroenterologist Andrew Wakefield, in a 1998 study published in The Lancet, claimed that he had found a link between autism and an anti - measles, scythes, and rubella that children have taken from the age of preschool.

His discovery caused doubts in his parents, and that suspicion remained until today. There is an increase in the number of children who are not vaccinated worldwide, and it is especially disturbing that measles is a disease that can also have fatal consequences. In addition, research conducted by CNN in 2015 has shown that parents who oppose child vaccine are mainly rich, white and educated. 57 percent of respondents explained why they did not vaccinate their children as “ancth about autism”.

The Truth

In his study of 2010, The Lancet denied claiming it was a “non-effective science”. As it turned out, Wakefield has been misleading the public because he deliberately forged the data and received money from lawyers working in lawsuits against the vaccine-related disease. Because of this, he was also left without a doctor's permission.

The American Academy of Pediatrics has now presented a series of studies that have found no connection between vaccine and the development of autism. Scientists also stress that only 5 percent of parents do not vaccinate children between the ages of 2 and 11 -- an extraordinary increase in the number of infected fruit throughout the country, resulting in an additional $2.1m in healthcare expenses.

2. A low - fat child prevents heart problems

Myth

The main cause of mortality in the 1940 ' s in the United States was heart disease. A number of studies have been conducted to find out why and how this causes the disease. Among other things, the well - known study of Framingham Heart and Seven Countys. The latter has examined risk factors in various cultures and has linked diets to fats consumed with heart disease.

The results were supported by the American Heart Association and alarmed for full fat. The trend was conveyed by the food industry that started production based on reducing fat in production. Heart disease remains the main cause of mortality in the country, despite increased popularity and anti-food propaganda.

The Truth

Millions of dollars were spent repeating the results of this study, so it was questionable to become the methodology they used. A new study of The Lancet, which included 18 countries on five continents, concluded that <x0-seconds are not related to heart disease”.

What turned out to be a real killer was a response to an inadequate study. Exactly because low - fat foods were ineffective, manufacturers began to add sugar. And now we know that sugar is very harmful to our health.

According to the report by the Institute of Internal Medicine, JAMA, published in 2014, people who consume 25 percent of their daily calories precisely through sugar - rich products have twice the chance of dying of heart disease than those who consume 10 percent or less, regardless of their age, gender, physical activity, or body mass index, the Kosovas conveys.

3. Regular PSA testing of prostate among young people can save lives

Myth

Prostatic cancer is one of the most common tumors among males, and second most lethal to lung cancer. Determining the antigen of the specific prostate is measured in the variety of this protein in the blood, which may indicate prostate cancer.

In 1994, the American Food and Barnat Administration approved such testing. Since it is a simple procedure and an invasive technique that can detect deadly diseases, over 20 million such tests are supposed to be conducted during the year.

The Truth

Most of them actually do more harm than they benefit. Even the doctor who discovered the possibility of such a trial called testing “a lucrative public health disaster”. In 2012, the U.S. Service Prevention Force advised against such tests, as about 80 percent had false positive results.

unnecessary treatments can include painful biopsy, surgery, and radiation. Experts estimate that five of the 1,000 men operating prostate cancer will probably die within a month, and at least 200-1000 men working with radiation develop a range of complications, including the correct disfunction, the problems of urinary leaving and so on.

The American Association for Urology does not recommend these tests in men under the age of 55, unless they have risk factors for developing cancer, such as smoking, overweight or family history.

4. Raw milk is healthier than clean

Myth

It is difficult to determine exactly when the idea arose, but the movement is getting stronger and stronger. 12 US states thus allow the sale of raw milk in stores, and 13 are still planning to go this way.

In the process of cleaning milk is heated to drown harmful bacteria, but raw milk promoters say heat also destroys important nutrients found in milk and that consumption of clean milk products causes the development of allergies and various symptoms of lactose intolerance.

The Truth

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration says there is no evidence that raw milk is better than clean.

It even states that as long as crude milk and its products are consumed by 3 percent of the population, they cause 96 percent of diseases associated with infected milk products. Infections of bacteria harmful to crude milk such as salmonella and E. The coli can lead to organ failure, paralysis, or death.

5. Operating, best option for lower back pain

Myth

In time, disk damage leads to microdies during movement. Nerve damage can happen, and pain can spread on foot as well.

By examining the MR or CT, narrowing the area between cells is often interpreted as disk degeneration and a source of pain. Hence, it seems logical that cell - or - bone - removal operations can limit microbes, creating more space for nerves and ease pain.

This reflection has led to an increase of 70 percent in such operations in 2001-2011. About 400,000 such operations are conducted annually in the US.

The Truth

A recent study has shown that 40 percent of people who are going through such operations after them still experience great pain. Developing complications can risk life to 20 percent.

Even with today's advances in technology, it's almost impossible to guess what causes back pain. About 85% are actually not specific species whose cause has not been identified, so the operation is not the best solution.

In 2017 the American Medical Society announced new guidelines, with recommendations for doctors to choose an option without surgery, such as exercise, physical therapy, and similar ones.

6. electroconcules therapy causes brain damage

Myth

The current that passes through the brain to cause chemical attacks seems barbarous. Hollywood movies show patients suffering pain before receiving such treatment and then becoming passive, and lose memory experience and personality change.

Indeed, in the early 50 ' s, psychiatric hospitals had used such therapy for “treatment” from disorderly behavior to homosexuality. These perceptions continue to exist. In a British study, about 20 percent of respondents said that they fear death if they submit to electrolytics.

The Truth

For people who struggle with resistant depression over any treatment, electrical shocks are often the only option. Antidepressive drugs succeed 50-60 per cent, while the success of such a procedure is 70-90 per cent. Studies show that healing in this way is certain and that memory loss is short-term, Kosovo Press broadcasts.

Patients don't feel the pain of procedure and there are no obvious concessions. It is generally a very effective treatment against depression and for preventing suicide, where it is evidently better than drug therapy.

Patients may note dramatic improvements after just one or two weeks, compared with six to eight weeks of total action - related antidepressants with possible side effects of weight gain, sleep disorders, and similar ones.