It is still not known when corruption cases that are conditional on visa removal will end

One of the conditions for visa liberalisation by the European Union, in addition to demarcation of the border with Montenegro, is fighting corruption. As a precondition for this judicial system in the country, there are 37 corruption cases targeted, which despite the fact that they are priorities, are still not known when they will end. [...]
One of the conditions for visa liberalisation by the European Union, in addition to demarcation of the border with Montenegro, is fighting corruption. As a precondition for this judicial system in the country, there are 37 corruption cases targeted, which despite the fact that they are priorities, are still not known when they will end.
As it broadcast the “Justice in Kosovo” from these 37 targeted subjects, four are still under investigation. While 29 counts are submitted on the database of targeted subjects.
Enver Peci, chairman of the Supreme Court of Kosovo, in his interview on Kosovo's “Directorate” has not been able to show when the preconditions for visa liberalisation will be completed.
The “on the database are 37 targets, ten of these cases have ended with formal-shaped bias. There are prison sentences, there are parole sentences, in cash, but there are also legal guarantees. According to recent notes and recent updates of these cases, I have found that all cases have worked. And as the court president, I can't get involved in the sense of how they have to be tested depending on the evidence, and since the case of”, Peci said.
According to him, the relevant commission assigned to monitor targeted cases is doing their job, and judges understand that in targeted subjects they should intervene as soon as possible.
“are cases targeted with specific names of criminal or random acts. On the basis of what I've seen on the database, even the working commission that is taking very seriously a conclusion that we as mayors of courts, like the assembly of court heads together with the Judiciary Council, are doing some analysis of where it should be interviewed faster. Ten cases have been carried out, the judiciary cannot work with automatism in the sense of processing cases. The commission's targeted subjects are constantly looking at cases in case to see if there are the judges' eventual concessions. And judges have been given firm positions by the commission that emergency should be carried out in targeted cases. But sometimes the emergency depends on many other procedures”, the Supreme Chairman said.











