Capussela: What's wrong with Special?

Andrea Laurenzo Capusela, in a text published at the Time portal, has asked several questions and raised some assumptions about the Special Court.

His two central questions are the following: why isn't the Special Court coming up?; and how does the inflammatory approach of political elite factions rooted in the KLA explain?

Let's start with the second question. He takes into account the PDK's initial stance, which was for the Special Court vote while the AAK and the Initiative were opposed. Then, in December, a return of this PDK stance occurred in the effort to abolish the Special. All of this, according to Capussela, may have been agreed on among party leaders é both the first time and now.

As for the Marty Report, he stresses that Thaci's name is mentioned 26 times, Kadri Veselin 7 times, Limaj 6 times and Haradinaj twice.

A term that capusela uses is “consyderate political”.

Of course, no obvious reason has ever been seen, unless the charges have endangered the heads of the Government, Parliament or Presidency of the Republic, or all of them. But if this explains the delay, why should it be expected that this court, unlike UNMIK and EULEX, will not be influenced by political considerations? ” He writes.

Can the Special Court's delay be the cause of these political delays? Only time can prove something like that.

Read the full text: http://www.koha.net/Reform/74988/two-question-for-trial-special/