Process showing face of state: 18-year-old Ashkali was sentenced by judges who held back from politicians

* Article prepared by Periscopi journalist Leonora Aliu.

Eight-page page is during the Act of the Foundation Court in Pristina, which defines the fate of 18-year-old Shenoll Tahiri from the Ashkali community in Podujevo. Nowhere is it said that the prisoner of seven years committed armed robbery or that this man had finally committed the robbery in question

The release of the news to the public followed with much criticism of the decision by MPs, journalists and civil society representatives.

But not just because of the foregoing. The same court has not rarely made decisions described as scandalous, especially in the case of corruption and official abuses that politicians, government officials, or Mafia were accused of.

Most of the time, the sentences were handed over. MinimumOr even. Not at all.

The same court had made the late activist Astrit Dehari terrorist. He had been in custody at the Prizren Pre-prisonment Centre when he had suffered a tragic death in late 2016. Later, during the further trial procedure for other activists in the case in question, the Court had found that There had been no evidence against Astri and others.

For the flow, the reaction of the Kosovo Judiciary Council following criticism of the decision on Shenoll Tahir is inappropriate. That's because this council of this court has left without “Picture” to defend itself.

But back to the Shenoll case.

His name and last name is already known, as he was known to be 18 years old by the discriminated Ashkali community.

What is further taught by the Constitutional Court's decision by Hamdi Ibrahimi, Shashivar Hoti and Naser Foniqi, is that the same was the robbery of a subsidiary of “Money Gram” in Podujevo. Tahiri allegedly robbed a lot of money under the threat of a weapon worth between 400 and 450 euros. Not even the amount itself is confirmed in the decision of nothing less than eight pages.

Horrible and racist is also his description. And his face was black because his hands were slightly whiteer and his face was quite black” said within the statement of one of two witnesses quoted in the Court's decision. He was not sure if the person described as “zac” was Shenoll Tahiri.

The Constitutional Court's eight-page ruling in Pristina states that Tahiri has been charged on September 10th by the prosecution because of criminal acts -- robbery and [during the trial] of ownership, control or unauthorized possession of weapons.

Amazingly, the date of the indictment's establishment corresponds to the same date that he is said to have committed crime in Zahir Pajaziti Square in Podujevo!

It is claimed that the convict was wearing a collar [the description of which the court does not give in the verdict] as well as a red - colored hat. Under threat of a weapon whose brand the Court says he doesn't know [because he has never managed to find it] Shenoll Tahiri is said to have threatened Besim Salih, Salih's glory and son, to receive the money worth 400-450 euros.

Tahiri is said to have never pleaded guilty to the charges against him until the end of the trial.

During the court procedure, the decision reveals that Tahiri, among other things, has stated that at the time he was accused of committing the criminal work of robbing money, he had been at the swimming house with a cousin.

“... because it had nothing to do with these criminal acts, that the police had told him that he had committed criminal acts, that he had not accepted anything in the police, but that a policeman had forced him to accept the performance of the work”, reportedly in the decision that further quoted Tahiri as saying that the guilty plea had, completely at the end of the trial, done under the pressure of police who had hit “boxing in the neck and kicks at” feet.

Thus, we have here involved the claim of convicts that physical violence was exercised against him. Tahiri went on to add: “... by video-inculating cameras doesn't match anything with me, nor the red hat, nor the jacna don't match me, I don't have the style of walking as the suspected person was seen; he had the longest beard... I don't have that gun because it's nothing like it with the case of the raid... I don't know about the bullets that were found in my house. ”

The court acknowledges the fact that a gun robbery has never been found, but claims that three bullets have been found in Tahir's house [which he charged with convicts with even the work of unauthorized possession of the weapon].

The only evidence that has been received on the basis of the Court is that of Besim Salih and Glory Salihu, husband and wife, but not of their son who was present on the day the event was supposed to happen.

Neither one nor the other witness has been sure if Shenoll Tahir was the person who robbed their money. They have claimed that the person who had performed the work had a bandage on his face, as a result of the injury, and to whom his jaws of color appeared. They've described the person as “zac”.

“ ...One person had raised “pistola” and had called out: “Pull out the money”; this person from face to face was “as black” because his hands were slightly whiteer and his face was completely black. Then he had told her son (the injured Doart Salihu): “jep” (front) in order to save their lives” is the description the Court gives Salih's testimony to glory. What those affected at the branch and how the money was done in his son's hands is not known.

At the end of the crippled court process, the Court says that Shenoll Tahiri had admitted guilt and that he had declared his work to be committed under the influence of alcohol.

But did this guilty admission occur after some pressure?

The court acknowledges the fact that the accused has been informed that admission of guilt is taken as a facilitating circumstance for him in the judicial process, until it denies there is evidence that there has been no constitutional treatment of Kosovo Police convicts.

However, Shenoll Tahir's self - righteous statement begins with a very interesting statement: “without any pressure acknowledged that he did a bad deed yesterday on September 10th.” Whether or not there was pressure we may never know. However, the Court continues to quote the self-fulfiling statement: “Day in the morning I went into town and had a few beers and started to freak out... then I went and bought a few beers, so I remember Spring ão 99 and went home where I drank and got drunk,”

I've been drinking before, I've got all the plaster that I've been holding for three years in a hot tub. That's all I've gone to town with where I'm in a bank near Kim Cookie. There were two people in the bank, one man and one woman. I directed them allat, which I had no bullets, and I told them to give them money worth between 400 and 430 euros. I'm sitting on my head and I'm on my way from the same cookie store and then to the Court and I've gone behind the cafes that are in front of the new Civil Record building. This is the first time I've done this bad work, which I sincerely regret...”

Asked by the police that the “left the red hat and the sweater “, the convict has replied that “has been thrown into a yard hole... so don't be surprised with someone's ears so he can be identified by the police. ”

Then, asked that “had left the weapon that he had used during the criminal offense, the accused claims that “does not remember, that he must have fallen somewhere because he was drunk”.

So, that's how you blame the 18-year-old convict.

What did the Court not tell us about Shenoll Tahiri?

The role of the Court can only be seen as that of a law - enforcement organization and the interpretation of laws in that form so that conflicts between people can be resolved peacefully. But not always local courts have managed to convince us that they are actually committed to such a thing. Many subjects have packed their drawers by remaining unresolved. Thousands of subjects inherit our courts annually as a failure to complete them successfully and in legal terms.

The point of Shenoll Tahir's case is that there are cases when the Court can decide at tremendous speed. Tahiri was charged, according to the subject papers, the same day that the alleged crime occurred - September 10th of this year. Apparently the prosecutor of the case had no need to investigate the case before the indictment was filed. Not a bit strange since the investigation also has procedures and an indictment has to be taken first for the launch of investigations. And, strangely ironic at one time is that Shenoll Tahiri he was 18, so he grew up two days ago. [His birthday is September 8, 2000.]

For more, the court over a period of only four months managed to elect the case by condemning the defendant who had just turned 18 and belonged to the Ashkali community [which we do not know if we are allowed to comment on the description of witnesses as ouszazak.

None of the witnesses have claimed that Shenoll is “zequ” they're talking about. Neither hats nor collars have been found nor is there any description of how he did the work and what he did with the stolen money. Consider, too, that stolen money could easily be discovered if he made any purchases at any point in the sale; it has a device for their confirmation; and so on. Moreover, the weapon he is said to have carried out the robbery, which will cost Tahir seven years in prison, officially does not exist. Not found. You don't know what brand has, so who made it.

Furthermore, no one at the Court seems to have shown interest in asking convicts about the branding of a pistol that kept it hidden in the chest for three years. And also, that where he got it from because three years ago he turns out to be only 15.

Also, it seems that the question wasn't even asked whether there was any injury on September 10th, or whether there was a bandage on his face, thus being described by eyewitnesses.

As a result, the Court has failed to offer answers to extremely basic questions that would arise to anyone who read its decision without prejudice.

On the other hand, there is inevitable irony. Two of the three judges who decided to punch the 18-year-old state from the Ashkali community have had it and have the same opportunity to show it when it comes to powerful politicians. Nobody's ever done it.

The first is called Hamdi Ibrahimi, former chairman of the Constitutional Court in Pristina. The second is called Shashivar Hoti, the judge in charge of the fate of Adem Grabovci of the PDK and the Proto case.

A few words about Hamdi Ibrahimi and Shashivar Hoti

When several arrests were carried out in 2014 on suspicion of illegal privatisation of the Podujevo Acumulators' factory [among which the LDK deputy, named Naser Rugova], this factory [conferring: The FAN had been on the mortgage at Raiffeisen Bank for an estimated 5 million, which its buyer, Agim Dodishk, had illegally exposed.

The FAN was privatised by Dudishk, long before he was arrested along with other indictees in the case, yet he had never been fully owned as he had failed to fulfill obligations stemming from the contract with the Kosovar Privatisation Agency [of Kosovo] The AKP, which included investments in the plant. Consequently, he had no right to put her assets into her mortgage unless a federal court gave her permission to do so.

At the time, he was the chairman of the Constitutional Court in Pristina, from Podujevo, who, according to the paper that was investigating that world special prosecutor Admir Shala, had made several calls to judges in the same city to ask to speed up the address of the desperate complaint, to allow him to mortgage the assets that were not yet his own, but the state. Over 5 million accounted for the loss of these FAN assets to the state. The end of this process is still expected to be seen.

As is expected to be seen if Shashivar Hoti will have a strong fist in the case of Adrem Grabovci and other indictees in the Pronto case.

One of the biggest cases currently being tried in our justice system is the case of the relationship “Proto”.

The Act, known as Pronto, was established by the Special Prosecutor of Kosovo in April of this year.

Eleven people with senior official positions, including a minister, former deputies, deputy ministers and former secretary general, are charged in this criminal case. When this subject was sent to serious crimes at the Constitutional Court in Pristina, where Hoti works as a judge, it was this one who after accepting the indictment of the relatives “Proto”, by the Kosovo Special Prosecutor, had decided that the case of Kosovo was sent to the Criminal General Department for trial. Apparently for Hoti, stealing 400 euros is a more serious crime than the case “Proto”. It was the complaint of the special prosecutor, Drita Hajdari, who had made Apel return the subject to the Randa Crime Department to the same judge.

But Hoti again seems that he did not find it a serious crime enough to awaken public interest. He had held the initial investigation of the prosecution in the case “Proto” by not allowing reading the indictment to the public at the request of defence lawyers even against the prosecutor's insistence that the indictment be read, an unusual judicial practice.

During his career as a war crimes judge, Shashivar Hoti has shared justice in some high profile cases.

Among these is the case of former Court of Appeals Chairman Sali McAw, where Judge Hoti had decided to conduct the trial by closed doors to the public.

Salih McAw had been acquitted this year of misusing the task, while during the proclamation of judgment, the judge had not reasoned anything about the decision before the public.

Hoti had shared justice even in the case of Bajram Pajazit, brother of hero Zahir Pajaziti, who was accused of misusing the task, even this case had ended with a free - law act.

The act of misusing duty to Murat Meshe, Ismet Kryeziu and Nemanja Spasic, It was rejected by the judge's decision, which was also confirmed by the Court of Appeals.

So also Shashivar Hoti, and his colleague Hamdi Ibrahimi, have been able to show their power in high-profile crimes. But they didn't.

It remains to be seen whether the case of Shenoll Tahir will encourage them to do so in the future, and to show the power of the state, even to the “empowered” that has conquered the state the same as the person described as the black “”.

The following is your ACTANDING:

PKR. No.247/2018

WRITER IN POPULATION

THE THEMAL JUDGES IN PRISTATIE Ibrahimi, jurors: Judge Naser Foniqi and Judge Shasivar Hotime attended the prosecution of Freedom Berisha, and Judge Blerta Krusha's translator of the court, on the criminal case now of Shenoll Tahiri, who, according to author Milan Milosavljevic of Gracanica for criminal acts: 1. Article robbery 329 pars. 3 over par.1 of KPRK, and 2. Property, control or unauthorized possession of weapons by Article 374 par.1 of KPRK, charged by the Founding Procuroia in Pristina under the PP indictment. I.nr.230/2018 of dt.17.09.2018, this specificity at the initial review session held on 10,10.2018 , after completing the trial review held on 10,12.2018 on which State Prosecutor Yavorka Perlinqev, accused and defender, damaged Besim Salihu and damaged Salihu, received the same day and proclaimed this:

A KGG Y K I M

Indictee  Shenoll Tahiri from Father Avni and the mother Veles of the gender Rexhepi born on the 08.09.2000 in Podujevo where she lives, the <x0 Street. Laje “Adem Podujevo” has primary school, ashkali, state of the Republic of Kosovo, No. Personal:12430606,

IT IS FATHER

Because:

1. On 10,09,2018 around 12:20 in Podujevo, on the “Zahir Pajaziti” in the “M0gram” drive for the use of force and serious rowing by pointing it into the owner of <x4Money <x5) this year's damage to Besimi Salihu by forcing her to give her very willing money in the 400, and then the Euro00stakes her to the item of the foreigner, now damaging her gun in the event, with her hand-to-hand, she's been taken away from the event.

• This is what he committed: Article 329 par.3 robbery connected to the KPRK's par.1.

2. On the date, the timing, and the location as point 1 of the device of this act on the basis of the robbery's criminal offense, are behind the firearms, the unknown brand pistleton, which has not been found, while during the raid on the family home of the accused on 1209.2018 on the “Ali Ajeti” on Podujevo, three rounds of pistol for which there was no permission from the competent organs have been found,-

- With this he committed criminal possession, control or unauthorized possession of weapons by Article 374 par.1 of KPRK

Therefore this court of the accused, Shenoll Tahiri, is sentenced for each of these acts of crime.

1. For criminal work: Article robbery 329 pars. 3 related to par.1 of KPRK charges it with fines of six hundred euros ($600,000) as well as prison sentences of seven years.

And,

3. For the criminal work of retaining ownership, control, or authorised possession of weapons by Article 374 par.1 of KPRK will place the prison sentence at a length of (1) years.

Based on Article 41, 73, 74 par.1 and par.2 under par.2 under par.2.2.2, 2.13, Article 80 par.1, articles 83 par.1, articles 329 par.3, Article 374 par.1 of KPRC, Article 365 and Article 4503 of KPP, and Article 393 of par.3.2 of the Law for the Elimination of the Crime Victims, accused Shenol of writing:

UNICHING

BURGING AND GJOBING

So that accused Shanoll Tahir appoints Prison Punishment in length of range seven (7) years and six months (6) like that I'm going to hold on to the full might of the act. and fined punishment The height of the widget  Six hundred euros (600,00 ) which I will pay within the 15 days term after the full might of the act.

The prison sentence also counts the time spent in custody from 11,09,2018 to the completeness of this act.

If the accused fails to pay the fine-then this sentence will be replaced in prison detention so that for every 20.00 of the remaining penalty, one (1) days in prison.

O BLIGHT was accused by Shenol Tahiri that the injured Besim Salihu compensated for the material damage to the height of four hundred euros (400.00,000 euros) within the 15-day deadline of the integrity of the act.

The damaged Besim Saliuhu for the rest of the property legal requirement is directed to regular Yurdiko-civil conflict.

Wounded Salihu's glory and injured Donart Salihu to implement the rich-juridic demand directed on regular Yurdico-civil conflict.

The accused Shenoll Tahiri is committed to compensate for the criminal procedure's expenses according to the final account, while on behalf of the judiciary, pay a hundred euros ($100,000, U.S.), while in the name of the tax on compensation for crime victims to pay fifty-dollar (50.00.0. m) all of these within the 15-day deadline of the full-power of the act.

Reason

The Constitutional Prosecutor in Pristina on the date 01.10.2018 has filed the PP indictment. I.r.230/2018 against now accused Shenoll Tahiri because of criminal acts: 1. Article robbery 329 pars. 1 of KPRK, while during the initial review, has made legal re-qualification of criminal acts, now accusing the accused of criminal acts: Article theft 329 par.3 linked to par.1 of KPRK, and 2. Possession, control or unauthorized possession of weapons by Article 374 par.1 of KPRK.

Indictee Shenoll Tahiri during the trial has not pleaded guilty to any criminal offense he was charged with.

In the judicial examination held in the presence of the parties this court, conform Article 7 of the KPP correctly and thoroughly confirmed the facts that are important for making the legal decision, with attention and maximum professional commitment and equal care proved the facts against the accused, as well as those that go in favour of defence, and during the trial, enabled the accused and his defender to exploit all facts and evidence that are in favour of the accused.

The accused Shenoll Tahiri's understanding of the defense, during the court review, has stated that at the time he was accused of committing a criminal robbery he had been along with his swimmer's cousin, that he had nothing to do with these criminal acts, that the police had told him that he had committed a criminal act, that he had not accepted anything in the police, but that a police officer had forced him to accept the performance of the “deed by boxing on my neck and foot, by video recording cameras he doesn't match me, that red hat, that't match me, I didn't have the style of walking, the old beard was seen, and I didn't have a case with a gun.... I don't know about bullets found in my house.

Now the accused, on 1109.2018 by authorisation of the state prosecutor (Prosecutor Yavorka Perlinqeviq), was interviewed in the quality of the suspect by the official police person at the Podujevo Police Station, with whom the process was held on a 208 interview. - AF-0784 dt.11.09,2018.

According to the chip on interview with mark 208 - AF-0784 d't.11.09.2018 turns out that the questioning of the now-intacted police officer on 1109.2018 had become a set-up of provisions of Article 57, 73,152 and 154 of the KPP, which had originally been provided protection according to official duty, av. Remzi Potoku, who had presented himself with the questioning case, and now the accused had been notified by his leader as a suspect, including with the right to keep quiet and not answer any questions, and to consult his defender before and during questioning.

In his statement given to the police in the presence of the defender, the defendant had now stated: “ ...without any pressure, he admitted that yesterday on the 1009.2018th day I did a bad deed. He said I went into the city yesterday and had a couple of beers where I had a little bit started cheating... then I went and bought a couple of beers as far as I can remember in Spring 99 and I went home and had a few more beers where I'm drinking, after which I'm drinking and I've been taking the plaster that I've been in a hothouse for about three years. That's all I've been with in town where I've entered a bank near Kim Demort. There were two people in the bank, so a man and a woman. I've been pointing at all I had no bullets and I told you to give me my money while they gave me about 400-430. .euro, I'm lowering my head and I'm going to Kim's Dessert and then to the court and I've gone behind the cafes that are in front of the new registry building... this is the first time I've done bad work, I sincerely regret this work I've done.” And in the police question: “where did you leave the red hat and the sweater?”, now the accused has replied: “I've got them in a yard cave, so don't be surprised by somebody who wears them and identified himself by the police. In the question where he left the gun he had used during the offense, the accused had now declared that he was not in my memory.”

Now the accused has been interviewed by the state prosecutor. In his statement given before the State Attorney and in the presence of his av protector. Remzi Potoku, PP Processor. I.nr.230/2018 of dt.12.09.2018, so just two days after the commission of the criminal act, there was also a statement that: “I remain entirely prey to the statement given to the police on the 1109,2018” and added: “ ...In the statement that I gave to the police I said I was under the influence of alcohol, roughly drunk, and the pool I had with me, of course, fell down on my way. Yesterday when I was in the police station I said that the gun was in the house even though I was aware that it wasn't me at home and that I did it for fear that the police would cause me something... I'm sorry because according to my statement the police had been forced to go out and do the raid on what I asked for forgiveness of all the organs... I found the Russians at home a while ago and hid them in the coffer..”

The injured Besim Salih in the quality of the witness during the trial, others have stated that the event had taken place in the middle of the day when he was working in his own bar with his son and that in the meantime his wife who works as a teacher had gone there and at that moment the person at the bar had entered the person who had pulled the gun out of the hall as seen in the video recording (CD) and had raised his gun towards his family to look for money and looked after what he could have done with his own family, the person who had taken a gun with a gun with a gun, while the guy who had picked up the gun in his hand, and he had pulled out of the red belt, and he saw what he had come up with the euro's face, and he had now noticed that he had been able to see the guy that he had been carrying on that he had been carrying on his desk with his own, and he had been carrying the car in the key, and he had been carrying on his own.

Wounded by Salihu in the quality of the witness in the court apart from others, stated that on the 10th,2018th before she went to work (work as a teacher) she went to her husband's bar of the injured man Besim Salihu, and that after she had entered the bar, when she was conversing with her son, the damaged Donart Salihu-had noticed that someone had entered the bar and that he was hurt because he had a black face and this person had gone up <x) and called <2x> She had told her son (the injured Doart Salihu) to give (money) in order to save their lives.

During the trial as material evidence by the state prosecutor, video footage was presented which security cameras were conducted at the bar where the criminal offense was committed. The video footage is from a bunch of completely clean-looking cameras and from what you see when a person who wears a red hat in his head, a bandage in his face and a jackne, walks into a bar with a gun in his hand, points a gun to the injured right now, while the injured takes the money and then walks off with a gun in his hand which he puts back in his belt.

Video footage from the security cameras in the loklin where the robbery is carried under gun threat, from which you observe as a person with a red hat and a jack, entered with a gun in his hand, pointed at his hands, took the money and then left the bar, ran away with the defendant's statement to the police when he described the way he had done this work until the red hat and the jakne had burned into the house for fear that someone would wear them and identify them as the head of the work.

As material evidence during the trial is presented also the confirmation of the seizure of items of 11,09,2018, which proves that in the case of the raid on the house of now accused dealt with and confiscated by the accused three rounds of pistol.

Following the presentation of evidence by the state prosecutor and after their administration and assessment, one by one and interrelated among themselves, the court considers that it has been achieved precisely and completely to prove that now accused Sheno Tahiri at the time and place pronounced in the indictment has committed the criminal act of robbery by Article 329 par.3 related to KPRC's par.1.

The court, with attention, praised the accused's statement given during the trial review.

According to the court's conviction, the statement of accused Shenoll Tahiri given during the court's defence review is completely oriented towards fleeing from responsibility and the defence thesis now accused of judicial examination has based on the claim that all that he had stated in earlier stages was given by being in unconscious state, or that he had appeared under police pressure.

This court considers that according to the subject's papers, there is no evidence that both police and the state prosecutor on the case of interviewing now the prosecution has acted in conformation of the KPP provisions and there is no evidence to question the respect of the currently accused's rights in the case of questioning by police or state prosecutor.

In the case of the settlement regarding the type and extent of the sentence for the prosecution, this court had in mind and took into consideration all possible extenuating circumstances. Regarding considering extenuating circumstances, the court finds that despite the court's directives, until the completion of the trial's investigation, it is suggested that the admission of guilt at any phase of the criminal procedure is considered a extenuating circumstance, and that the court was able to pronounce the sentence even under the minimum punishment prior to the criminal act of robbery by Article 329 par.3 concerning par.1. Despite the fact that all evidence clearly administered proved beyond any suspicion that the accused is currently the head of this criminal act, the same until the end of the trial has pleaded not guilty to any of the criminal acts he was charged with.

According to Article 329 par.3 related to par.1 of the Republic of Kosovo's Criminal Code, the penalty for the crime of robbery is a fine and prison sentence of seven (7) to twelve (12) years.

As noted earlier, the court was unable to apply the legal provisions on easing the sentence so as to pronounce the sentence for criminal action even under the minimum punishment prior to the grounds because the accused has now pleaded not guilty, and for the most part in the trial has attempted to flee from the Persian responsibility with statements that everything he had said earlier or was the result of the pressures of investigative bodies or was unaware of what he had declared.

In the case of setting up the type and height of the sentence this court is a facilitator for the accused, he considers his new age to be 18 years old, although this extenuating circumstance may be influential in this criminal case only in the possibility that the court will declare prison sentence at the limit of the mimum of the pre-lawed punishment, but not under the minimum of that sentence.

As for the penalty for criminal possession of property, control or authorised possession of weapons by 374 par.1 of KPRK, this court has ruled that the accused would be sentenced to one-year-long prison sentence because the accused has now initially admitted that the weapon-revola used in the case of the robbery committed by Article 329 par.3 in connection with the money.1 KPRK at home, then declared that he had dropped the case of escape, and then that he doesn't own this weapon at all. So it turns out that this weapon may still be in unauthorized possession of any person and used for any criminal offense, while the accused does not reveal where this weapon is now, which this behaviour of the accused has yet to be considered otherwise as a reconciliation that, even in the future, with his weapon carried out any criminal act.

In terms of the unique sentence pronounced on this court, the court considers that even with this unique condemnation to pronounce-as regards the crime of robbery is at the expense of the minimum sentence pronounced, general and individual intent will be achieved, and that the accused now finally becomes aware that the chosen course is the wrong way, while other persons will be prevented from committing these criminal acts by being aware of the sentences they are facing.

This court considers that the criminal procedure currently implemented against accused Shenoll Tahiri until the court's verdict is given the possibility of opposing the ban, is fully applied to the European Convention for Human Rights, Article 5,6 and 7, because the accused has been detained by court verdict, given access to the possibility of personally protection, and with the help of the protector of the Parliament as his choice, and by the end of the trial has been guaranteed the right to present any defense and rejection of any evidence. Also during the time of detention, the court has seen to it that the prosecution has the potential to exploit its rights.

In the case of the criminal case, the court approved the property-juridical request of the injured Salihu and charged accused Shenol Tahiri to compensate for the material damage caused by the criminal work of the robbery so that I must pay 400,00 euros within the 15-day term of the money being robbed by the accused to the injured, and proven by the testimony of the victim al-Sulhu and the video recording of security cameras at the club where the robbery was conducted. For the rich-juridic demand on the amount of this wealthy-juridical request approved, the injured court has ordered the injured to regular legal-civil dispute because the height of demand until the completion of the trial has not been determined.

The injuries Donart Salihu and Salihu Glory for the realisation of the rich-juridical beggars have been instructed in regular legal-civil disputes under 463 pars. Two of the KPP.

In terms of criminal procedure costs, it is decided under the KPP's 450th subheading, while the penalty for compensation of crime victims is decided on the basis of Article 39 par.3.2 of the Crime Victims Compensation Law.

The higher it is set as a device for this act.

THE THEMAL JUDGES WRITER IN PARENTS

The Rain Crimes Department

PKR.N. 247/20-18 dt. 11,12.2018

The processner,

Freedom Berisha chairman of the court-judge,

Hamdi Ibrahimi

WHO JURDICS: Against this act, a complaint could be filed at the Court of Appeals of Kosovo within the 15-day deadline (15) 15 days from the day of the court's admission. The complaint is exercised through this court.