Serbian historian ïrondit '% Serbia with this statement to Albanians

Read full Serbian President Olivera Milosavlevq's aunt, which has been released from a long work on Serbian-Albanian reports:

“With the Serbian government's invading policy towards the Arabs, on Serbia's western border have developed such relations that in the near future, peace and stability can be expected [...] our press, in a catastrophic race to help a policy referred to and executed in atrocious manner, for months and years (has) spread biased thoughts about the Arbaans [...]

This is also today the only means by which the chauvinist press creates in the Serbian people the hatred of wild arnauts “wilder”, hiding, such as the necre of wildness, what the Serb people have done to them. [...] The Balkans and Dr. Vladan [Gorgjevich] has written from a complete book with a clear desire to suppress this unfortunate Arab people and prove their inability to a cultured and national life. [...] in order to prove that this race people have no sense of culture and independence, all that in the primitiveness of that people exists, they present, not as an expression of the scale of history that they are found and that other peoples have gone through, but as expressions of their racial inability for cultural development in general. [...]15823552 9210892955174 69353007684275820 n

The zeal of Balkancus for underestimating the Arab people as breed goes so far as Skenderbeu's historic role is attributed to origin by Serbian Vojislava” (Dimitrije Tucovic [1914] 1980:17-44).

Can't be denied that today Albanians are regarded as “enemies<x1nd Serbia's largest.

If we can easily explain this with current political events and the description of their “ ” by improper media, it is necessary to analyze more seriously the reasons for their contempt that, sometimes openly and sometimes secretly, are exposed throughout the 20th century.

Contemporary intellectuals write about Albanians mainly within the stereotype of their “born” hatred of Serbs and their desire for their destruction, which is the product of their “tiparies”, “pzimivism” and “migration”.

The old authors, however, have insisted on an element as well. They have attempted, among other things, to prove that the inability of Albanians to an independent state life is still due to their characteristics in “karacter”.

They claimed that Albanian tribes need neither state nor ability to constitute their own nation.

Therefore, in line with Serbia's state-political needs, the solution has been seen in the colonial tribal influences which, with the inclusion of Albanians and their territories in the Serbian state, would enable their training for a civilized life. In this sense, classifying derogatory stereotypes for Albanians could be done this way: “Albanians hate Serbs”: they have specific properties in the “curacter” from which this hatred derives; Albanians have been largely converted, the so-called occupied Serbs, with which two “realist” previously explained.

With these contemporary assessments in order, there are also those who throughout the century depend on Albanians who haven't been restoring the nation and who have no civilisation skills for organising the independent state, and the product of the last stereotype is also the argument that Skenderbeu is Serb.

By the name of the Albanian, by the mid-80s, in particular have been used by the words <x0ocide”, “impression”, “packije”, “dunk”, so negative corruption has kept every mention of national minorities in political and private speeches.

Following author Dimitrije Bogdanovic's book on Kosovo in 1985 and his frequent interviews that same year, writing for Albanians on the part of Serbian intellectuals, has only been acceptable if it was written in terms of the evidence of the planned “genocide against Serbs, where Bogdanovic himself was soon exceeded in the negative charge of the subject of analysis.

Bogdanovic has been reactivating the old argument that placing Albanians on Serbian lands from the 18th century to our time has left the bloody <x0nd) traces of violence in the historical conscience of the Serbian people”, as long as he has expounded with examples of individual oppression, plunder, massacres, massacres and “the destruction of Serbs from their land”, as well as arguments that the base of Albanian expulsion should be required in their Islam, and “

Thus, according to him, the Serbian people have become the victim, not only of one element but also of a “plan for its physical destruction”.

The spread of such a negative picture to a whole people is made through the appreciation of the Albanian political movement as <x0-aggressive, conqueror, revanstist, conservative and nationalist (1)x1>, whose intentions are to destroy the Serbian people “with the help of the murders, deportation, wipe out the historical conscience”, and “adopt Serbian soil” that <x6m> plan to break and surround the Serbian people”.

According to Bogdanovic, the topic for the Albanian Illyrian background is racist because with it their agrarian right to territories is determined.

In addition, speaking of the migration of Serbs to the Balkans, of the time it marks as the history of Albanians, it mentions the predecessors of Albanians by not defining who they were (Bogdanovic] 1990:29,50031,139,154,3185025,443445).

For Radovan Samardzic “arbanians“since the XVIth century have been on display while Turks are the ones that <x2 used to rush” Serbs “that as destructive forests enter their old homeland”.

According to him, Albanians have oppressed the Serbian people with “murders, plunder, with the burning of all villages, with land theft and violent Islam” ( Samardzic, 1989:123,253). Even for Marko Mladenovic, often present in public, genocide and apartheid in Kosovo are not inconsistent, and the story of the Illyrian origin is “archeological rule” in order to claim their right to “the homeland of the history ancestors of today's”.

He stresses that by the 18th century, there have been no Albanians in Kosovo, which until World War II have not been a majority. “The execution of Serbs from Kosovo and Metohia extends from the undisciplined to the Baltics, that is, from Islam to extreme nationalism” (Myrovitch, 1989:6369).

According to these intellectuals, child exploitation is not even disputed for political purposes. The difference lies only in the path of their use.

While Bogdanovic sees the exploitation of Albanian children in “their” inciting to attack Serbian children (Bogdanovic [1985] 1990:312), Mladenovic sees it using it to reach the number of dominance among Albanians (M Mladenovic, 1989:86).

Atanasije Yevtiq says that the goal of Albanians in Kosovo has long been this: the more land, the more children and the more weapons “, the particularly “that Albanian children have not only been <x3manipulated, but in the depths are filled with hatred for all that is Serb and Christian in Kosovo and Metohi”, by ascribing this to parents, teachers, “primitive tribal filtration<6> and <x> (Jevtic, 1992:542)

As far as, according to Bogdanovici, Albanians have been a tool in the hands of Turks, according to Nikola Samardzic they have been a tool in the hands of the Roman Kury, which “has been counted in people of weak religion who violate the given word, and which, without much trouble, would turn into Catholic”

Giving its characteristics for Albanians, Samardzic mentions “the fierce nature of the Arabs”, “the fantastic potential for reproduction”, “the inhumanity”, the bloody “orgy” 2 / 1 Samardzic, 1990:56, 60).

Otherwise, during the 1990s, the predisigrating was Miodrag Jovicic's writing in Serbia's Academy of Sciences and Arts summary for Serbs and Albanians in the 20th century. Albanians are there “arauts”, the villains and robbers, with a tendency for violence “to bleed”. Even for Jovicicqi, Islamis responsible for why Albanians have won from Turks “blanshe mines, with atrocities, robbery and looting” to terrorise the Serb population.

Acknowledging that by tradition and by acumen of experience, certain biological and national predispositions are created, he points out that all layers of the Albanian population “have entered the blood of violence, but also hatred of the Serb population, which is guilty of living”.

Analysis of historical events such as <x0 debt return” here has come more directly. While acknowledging that Albanians in the Kingdom of Yugoslavia “have not been worshipers of the” regime, Jovic claims “they have not, for the most part, packed their debts to the Serb population during the Turkish occupation of”.

In the same style of deserved and undeserved history is the conclusion that, given experiences from the past, the Albanian “minorities in Serbia, said simply, have not deserved their autonomy”.

On the contrary, that (Albanian minority) “according to various thoughts” had to be placed in a special quarantine “where it would be forced to offer evidence that is ready for civilized coexistence, then given autonomy. Albanians are Serbia's “blood enemies and Serbs”, holders of “souvinism and aggressive racism”, proving the possibility of creating conditions for normal co-existence of members of different ethnicities in Kosovo and Metohi”.

They feel deep hatred of Serbia and Serbs”, of “their genocide” have century-old work “”. The author sees solving this problem in changing the province's existing ethnic picture with the return of the outcasts, with new populations and the suspension of existing autonomy at certain times (Jovicic, 1991a:138 soul139,143146,151153).

Contemporary authors write for “The historic reference of Albanians” (Dragiq Kükuuk, 1992: 411); for “open genocide against the Serbian people”, for which the XIX thing has been used during the XX century “plachies, murder, rape and kidnapping of women who have later been converted to Islam” (Baktovic, 1992a:453); for ethnic and religious intolerance against Serbs, which has been “the foundation of all archbanian movements” (Bakkovic, 1991:38); for “aggressive and destructive to anything that was Serbian”, as was “always their behavior, occupational and exemplifying” (Vevtich, 1992:542).

Referring to the centuries-old history of relations “serbo-Albanian”, it is said today that the wild and aggressive “paralysion of the nationalism of Albanian separatism regularly occurs when demographic balance-equivocal imbalance”, which is in nature “ (Gluschlic, 1992:620), as well as that Albanians in the persecution of Serbs have been the most radical and cruel “of others -- they have used the most brutal means, according to their mummedano-Turkish tradition and fashito-ballist” (Cosip, 1992:64).

Since the second half of the 20th century, the negative stereotype for Albanians has been expressed in a series of books of Serbian authors without any particular scientific editing. The most extensive one has, of course, been to hate Serbs.

Even Haxhi Serafim Ristic has mentioned Albanians as the worst enemies of Christian religion and the blackest tormentors of poor youth” (Ristic, 1864:40), and Radosavljevic Bdin, with wide patriotic moods, counting the tools that all enemies of Serbs (communicates) use in the joint effort to destroy Serbs, writes Albanians that they used “thics, dust and lead” (Bdin, 1903:15).

Hadzi-Vasilevic has praised the arnauts as “the most ardent opponents of Serbs” (Haxhi-Vasilevq, 1906:61), <x2 Serbian enemies” (Haxhi-Vasilevq, 1909a:2), saying that “Serbs value the arnauts as their biggest enemies and they characterize them with these words: “ (Haji-Vasilevq, 1913:143).

(Olivera Milosavlevic (1951-2015) has been a Serbian and legal historian at the Faculty of Philosophy in Belgrade. It is known for critical access to contemporary Serbian history and the breaking of national myths popular in history books. The above text is the first part of a Milosavlevic long paper on Serbian-Albanian reports)