UPu awarded tender to company that fails to meet criteria

The National Audition Office found that last year The UPI had awarded the tender worth 29 thousand and 700 euros to an economic operator that has offered no testimony to similar supplies in the past, though this was the criterion for selection.

According to the audience, the supply was then rejected by Pristina University because sports equipment did not meet the conditions required by contract.

The additional supply with these devices has not been made, because the eco-communication operator has licensed the equipment, but the accession commission has estimated that they do not match the alleged specifics in the contract”, the audience report says.

The audience rejects these equipment from the UPI and links it to the failure to meet the criteria by which the operator was awarded contracts.

“The selection of economic operators who do not meet the criteria set out in the tender file increases the risk that operators cannot offer supplies/conform technical specifications required for the purpose of the”, the audience's report for UPA follows.

The National Auditing Office for the past year has found that two UPP contracts have signed them without declaring how much funds it has for them.

According to the ZKA, tenders worth 25 thousand and 43 thousand and 226 euros have been signed without the declaration of the needs and availability of funds that are provided with the public procurement directive.

That's what he considers dangerous.

We've noted that in the courses the laboratory device is worth 25,000 and the material laboratory provider is worth 43,226, the Declaration of Needs and the Determination of the Fund (DNPDF) was signed following the initiative of the procurement procedure. Initiation of procurement procedures in the absence of DNPDF increases the risk of the university entering into office in the absence of sufficient funds”, the KKA reports.

The audience has also found that UP has violated procurement rules by not appointing contract managers.

For contracts regulation of the University Library Kulm worth 105.710 and Plato's renovation - number 1X worth 72,205, no contract managers were appointed and no contract management plans were devised. This is a requirement of procurement rules. This could bring difficulties in implementing projects and potential deviations from the previous <x0-> contract, the audience suggests.

MST: Professors' surplus budget payment

The National Audition Office recommends halting the professors' payments for each exam submitted by students.

According to the audience, payment of 60 cents for each student to present the exam causes budget damage, since students do not pay for testing.

According to current guidelines in force, bachelor-level students don't pay at all for testing, and students at the master's level for each submitted exam pay 2.5. This means that the revenues provided by the exam report do not cover the costs for compensation of professors”, the audit report says.

ZKA suggests that this regulation be adjusted on the basis of the budgetary opportunities and needs that exist for making these payments.

“Keeping exams would have to be an integral part of the work tasks for which professors receive the basic wage and eventually the hospitals. Compensation of professors for exams causes unnecessary costs for UP and may bring financial difficulties. The possibilities for reviewing the above regulation should be seen so that it can adapt to the current circumstances and budgetary opportunities”, the audience recommends.

In addition, the ZKA has found 25 cases where professors are engaged by exceeding the rate of hours allowed contrary to domestic regulation.

“Internal Director of Personal Revenue to the UPI clearly stipulates that academic personnel in regular university relations can commit themselves to over-orm by five (5) hours a week, exclusively at the Faculty of Arts, up to four (4) hours a week. Of the 93 tested samples we've noted that in 25 cases the professors' contracts were with six (6) hours on the rate, exceeding the allowed overorm”, the audience report said.

At the same time, there were cases when professors were paid, although they did not keep the early hours.

“We have noted that in eight (8) cases, although it has not been kept the full rate of hours and hours on the rate, the payment has been made full according to commitment-contert, even though the regulation determines that the failure of the hours should be penalised with the partial removal of the” pay, the audience claims.

Some of the audience's other recommendations include the correct list of evidence to keep watches that are also evidence of a professor's payment.

KA LLXO.com also wrote about finding another 6th of the National Auditing Office - the payment of a professor for 7 years without contract in the UP.