Murder in Pec: Lawyer warns speculation against the prosecutor

Lawyer Bahtri Troshupa plans criminal proceedings against the prosecutor in the trial for Mentor Zekiaj's murder in Pec. The defense of accused Kreshnik Haliti, the accused of killing Mentor Zekiaj in Pec, on March 6th 2017 demanded the dropping of the indictment, rejecting evidence and firing criminal procedures. He presented these requirements in writing to [...]
The defense of accused Kreshnik Haliti, the accused of killing Mentor Zekiaj in Pec, on March 6th 2017 demanded the dropping of the indictment, rejecting evidence and firing criminal procedures. He filed these requests in court, Bahtir Troshupa, Kreshnik Halit's lawyer, while informing the chairman of the court, Joy Mujarri. Under requests filed by lawyer Troshupa, there are circumstances that exclude Kreshnik Halit's criminal responsibility for serious murder.
Haliti, according to demands filed by his lawyer, has used critical actions in self-defence on a critical day, since according to the lawyer, there had been attempted murders against him on the part of the late Mentor Zekij.
The lawyer said the indictment is based on unacceptable evidence.
On the other hand, defence objections have been considered groundless by the prosecutor, Ardian Hajdaraj.
But for prosecutor Ardian Hajdaray, the request for the rejection of the indictment by lawyer Troshupa has been made only superficially and without any basis.
The defence claims that during the site's view of the police scene, the defence has not participated, are unreasonable and groundless, because on the critical day the suspect's identity was not known, nor the identity of his defender”, prosecutor Hajdaraj said.
Even the injured party's lawyer, Gezim Kolcak, agreed with the prosecutor's claims, while adding that the defendant's defence in no case has argued against the indictment's evidence.
In addition, lawyer Bahtri Troshupa, arguing objections to the evidence of the indictment, cited the circumstance that neither the judge was present at the scene, demanding that even the country's procession of the event be declared unacceptable evidence.
Even a witness's statement, according to the lawyer, should be declared unacceptable in further stages of reasoning that it had impacts on its statement by police officials.
But, prosecutor Ardian Hajdaraj said the witness's statement remains in the prosecutor's assessment of whether it was true or not, though he added that the declaration of the same was the same in the police as in the prosecutor.
Prosecutor Hajdaraj also said they are unprofessional and unethically statements by lawyer Troshupa in objections to the indictment that he will file criminal charges against two witnesses, policemen, two lawyers and the prosecutor himself.
His efforts are clear based on this “, said prosecutor Hajdaraj.
In this trial, Kreshnik Haliti is accused of grave murder by Mentor Zekij.
In this trial, Kreshnik Haliti is accused of grave murder by Mentor Zekij.
In the afternoon of March 6th this year, Mentor Zekiaj of the shooting of the fire had remained dead in Peja's “Fidanish 35x1> neighbourhood. /Call. com/












