That's how millionaire Arba Abrashi tried to deceive Kosovo's state with Russian vodka shipping

Customs authorities in the decision taken in December 2012 have listed arguments about why they have not entrusted statements to the company of Arban Abrash, the LDK candidate for Pristina chairman.

The customs authorities' decision shows that the Abrash company had declared a amount of the value of these products, but the declared sum was not in line with the real amount of products.
Customsmen had found that the LDK candidate-owned company had presented lower prices than the market value. Kosovo customs has confirmed that the company of Abrashi has presented the value of products to many of 8 thousand and 600 euros, but in fact it was 11,000 euros.

Based on this decision, Abrashi's company had disagreed with the customs authorities' decision. However, this decision shows why Dogan has not entrusted the company of Abrash.
The decision lists arguments about why there has been distrust of the statements of Abrashi Company. Customs authorities have concluded that in the trial management procedure, the surveillance documentation of the damaged goods has been deemed insufficient evidence because the delivery bill and goods has not been sealed on the behalf of the export company, as well as proven by the exporter state.

The first reason is the fact that the bill was issued, not by the manufacturer, but by the mediator
In addition, material paperwork lacks the trading contract between exporters and importers, in which prices of goods would be defined. Another reason is mentioned that the company has not filed a bill for which the subject has paid the goods. Another reason is mentioned that he has faced with distrust of the customs authorities. The company, according to the decision, has offered no evidence of how to order the goods, and has not presented bank transfers.

The loading place does not correspond to the export commodity site. So in the absence of showing complete and reliable documentation to prove that the transactional value is the real value paid for the damaged goods, in the concrete case transaction value cannot be accepted as the real value paid for the damaged goods.”, it says.
The customs authorities' decision states that “is tasked with the complaining subject that conforms Article 56 of the Administrative Procedure Law, his claims to testify with reliable evidence that proves gold with complete and original documentation harmonised for the real value of paid or payable goods for the controversial property”.

Insander has sent questions to Abrash's team to clarify this story of Abrashi company with Kosovo Customs, but has not yet received an answer