22 minutes agoPublic Procurement and Abuse Act
Periskopi(24 days ago)
(24 days ago)According to the indictment, during August 2024 in Prizren, defendant U.D., in the quality of company director “M.L.L.C.”, during application in the public procurement procedure, titled “Physical security at the Prizren municipality's primary health facilities”, worth 80,825.60 euros, has submitted false documentation, respectively, a bill worth 4,775.00 euros, with the aim of fraud and impact on the decision of contracting authority.
According to the indictment, the documentation presented under the offer has been verified by ATK and is found not to be declared under tax legislation in effect.
For the same actions, the indictment has been raised against the judicial person “M.L. L.C.”
The prosecutor of the case in the case of setting up the indictment has proposed to the court that, after maintaining judicial examination, managing their trials and assessment, the high-ranking defendants for criminal work accused of being found guilty and convicted by the law, the prosecutor of the case has proposed a supplementary punishment for non-ordination in public administration or public service.
The Constitutional Prosecutor in Prizren, the Department of Internal Crimes, has filed charges against the U.D. defendant, and the judicial person “M.L.L. Cʹ due to well-based suspicion that the same were committed criminal work “Use and public procurement fraud” by Article 415 of the Kosovo Republic's Penal Code (KPRK).
According to the indictment, during August 2024 in Prizren, defendant U.D., in the quality of company director “M.L.L.C. ”, while applying in the public procurement procedure titled “Physical security at Prizren municipality primary health facilities”, of 80,825.60 euros, has presented fake documentation, a bill worth 4,775.00 euros respectively, with the aim of fraud and influence in the decision of contracting authority.
According to the indictment, the documentation presented under the offer has been verified by ATK and is found not to be declared under tax legislation in effect.
For the same actions, the indictment has been raised against the judicial person “M.L. L.C.”
The prosecutor of the case in the case of setting up the indictment has proposed to the court that, after maintaining judicial examination, managing their trials and assessment, the high-ranking defendants for criminal work accused of being found guilty and convicted by the law, the prosecutor of the case has proposed a supplementary punishment for non-ordination in public administration or public service.
