He's been severely persecuted by Shkelzen Gashi: I don't know. You don't understand. The Book is clear.

She's not even a researcher. ”

A government - funded project has caused strong reactions to distort history. Gashi said he received the data from the Fund for Humanitarian Law and from Natasa Ka persecuted.

For the Dubrava Massacre, he also mentioned “48 Albanians armed”. Following the organisation's reactions and distance, Natasa Camdic questions in the first place for Gashi to be professionally qualified, as someone who He has no knowledge, nor does he understand what we have written. ” It refers to the description Gashi also wrote in his book, even at the exhibition given in Pristina Square for Dubrava Massacre. How could she ask, so that prisoners deprived of freedom are also “armed?” For what Gashi has written is that they are listed as “soldiers” she says that at the moment of their arrest they are changed status, logical; and that's where the Geneva Convention applies. Furthermore, the “soldier list of” from which Gashi has ascertained armed Albanians has also been obtained from Serbian state data at the time, Ka persecuted.

You don't understand. He doesn't understand, nor does he have the knowledge to understand what we have noted that some of the killed were KLA members. But that means they were members of the KLA before they were arrested; because some of them were convicted, accused, and then changed status. But for history and knowledge and truth it's very important... and they're all victims of war crimes. I'm sorry, but Shkelzen Gashi doesn't understand that. They were killed as prisoners by armed guards,” He said he persecuted the Nacional.

Under the question that the content of that exhibition is also the principal derivative of the book that Gashi had written earlier, he persecuted is aware that that that book does not belong to science. “I've seen a lot different things in”, She told us and noticed that Historians in Pristina have also criticised him. ”

National asked Ka persecuted how she comments that apart from historical deviation, it is also a distorted data; she says I see that he doesn't understand the facts. ”

The “Usht (listed) does not mean armed Albanian, because many people targeted as members of the KLA, they have not lost their lives in combat, they were killed in situations with other unarmed civilians, because he is not at the time in the role of the fighting, here is the difference. But Shkelzen Gashi can't understand that, because he's not a researcher,” It's over.

Because those listed as “soldier” were data received from state authority and prison at the time, he says “Yes, of course, from other sources. ”

Living of the Humanitarian Law Fund

The Fund for Humanitarian Law has publicly rejected Skelzen Gashi's claims regarding Kosovo's “Masakrat exhibition and book 1998 1999”, naming some of the findings as inaccurate and unprofessional.

In the official response, the organisation rejects the claim that “armed persons --” -- were Albanian prisoners under full control of Serbian authorities.

“The data presented [...] in some cases provides an incorrect crime mirror. This is not a matter of interpretation, but a fundamental lack of knowledge of international humanitarian law”, said in response.

According to the fund, even in cases where some of the victims had previously been members of the KLA, they at the moment were not fighters, but persons deprived of freedom and protected by the Geneva Convention.

The organization points out that confusion with the circumstances of death has led to deformities in the nature of crime. It is wrong and unprofessive to conclude that a person has been killed as a fighter only because he was formerly a member of the KLA”.

The reaction proves similar mistakes even in the Meja case, where the victims, though some former KLA members, were killed as unarmed civilians under Serbian control.

Also criticised is the interpretation of events in Recak, referring to the testimony of Shukri Boja in the trial of Slobodan Milochev, where the distinction is made between fighting and killing civilians.

The Fund considers the effort to attribute these inaccuracies to the organisation itself to be an attempt to discredit its database.

The incorrect presentation of facts [...] relates crimes and seriously violates the dignity of victims”, concludes the response, demanding the withdrawal of the exhibition from public space.