Rector Hajrullahu figures as chairman of NGO board behind exhibition that incorrectly reflected massacres in Kosovo

University of Pristina Rector Arben Hajrullahu continues to figure as Board Speaker on the official page of “Admore” ) one of the organisations responsible for the scandalous exhibition that caused deep public indignation with inaccuracies about massacres in Kosovo, despite the fact that he claimed to have left this organisation.

A simple search on the admovere.org website reveals the involvement of the head of the country's largest institution of higher education at the top of this organisation. In address book “The Board's chairman, reports Nacional, broadcasts Periscopi.

Rector Hajrullahu reacted yesterday through a public communiqué, flatly denying being part of an organisation. However, on the official site of this NGO, his name still continues to figure as Board Speaker.

Pristina University Rector “, prof. Arben Hajrullahu explains the public opinion that, since the day of the election to the function of the UPI sector on August 7th 2024, has resigned from all functions in any other organisation or institution except the University of Pristina.

In defense of his academic and human integrity, as well as the institution that leads, Rector Hajrullahu will begin to pursue legal ways against all cases of false news that are constantly emerging, within the framework of deliberate deinforming campaigns”, It says in reaction.

This organisation and organisation “Integre” was behind the exhibition “Masakrat in Kosovo 1998-1999”, the exhibition that triggered waves of reactions as a result of inaccuracies in Kosovo's Massacres reflection, accusing of spreading Serbian propaganda to Pristina Square.

Materials of this event, which also enjoyed financial support from the Kosovo Assembly, were removed from the capital's central square on Saturday morning, just five days from the day they opened. This exit of the wrong data panels came directly after the Pristina municipality made a decision to cancel the permit of this installation in response directly to the widespread civic indignation over the deviations encountered in the exhibition texts.

Gashi's claims, which claimed to be based on the Fund's sources for Humanitarian Law, have been openly rejected by this organisation itself, qualifying them as completely unprofessional deviations.

Through an official stance, they stressed that “This is not a matter of interpretation, but an basic lack of knowledge on international humanitarian law”.

The institution also clarified that people killed at the Dubrava prison were under absolute supervision of the Serbian state as prisoners, and in no way were active participants on war fronts.

Serbian activist Natasa Ka exactly persecuted this approach. In a proposal for National journalism, Gezzair Dashiri, she said among other things: You don't understand. He doesn't understand or has the knowledge to understand what we've written”.

According to the activist, from the time of the ban, these persons are changing status and enjoy full judicial protection guaranteed by the Geneva Convention.