Matoshi: The Constitution imposed new “balance” ) happened as I predicted on March 6th

Analyst Halil Matoshi has fought after the Constitutional Court Act, where he says it happened exactly as he had predicted on March 6th. Matoshi stresses that the Constitution introduced new balances among powers. It went exactly as I predicted on March 6 to public debate. The Constitutional Court ruled with a new balance between [...]
Matoshi stresses that the Constitution introduced new balances among powers.
It went exactly as I predicted on March 6 to public debate. The Constitutional Court ruled with a new balance between Article 82 and 86 and the balance between powers, declaring the President's decree ineffectually uninflicted, and clarified Albin Kurti's claim to the desirable position of MPs in the hall. The President's decree falls because the Parliament did not have two months from the institution until the election of President/es”, he said.
Among other things, he adds, the 34-day deadline is Kurti's second chance to give the country effective institutions and not normalise a government in office and a UD president.
“also confirmed that the country (in any other case) if it fails to elect president/at least a month before the mandate ends, the Assembly is dissolved with automatism. 34 days of time is the second opportunity for Kurt to give the country effective institutions and not normalise a government in office and a UD President”, he concluded for Blic.












