“E attacked “What was stated at the hearing about the suspects who killed the brother in Kline?

The Foundation Court in Pec has set 30 days of detention for Jetmir Jusuf, who allegedly killed his brother, Faruk Jusuf, on Saturday (March 21st) in Bocsic, Cline. Insander has secured the court's document on the detention measure. He is suspected of criminal acts “grave murder” and “keeping control, ownership [...]
Insander has secured the court's document on the detention measure.
He is suspected of criminal acts “grave murder” and “maintaining control, ownership or unauthorized possession of weapons”.
The defendant's defender, lawyer Mimoza Zeka, said during the hearing that the victim had initially attacked the defendant.
“in the quality of the defendant's defence, Jethmir Jusufaj, strongly disputes the demand for the detention measure's appointment. From the prosecution's own description, it is clear that the event took place at 21.03.26, about 1500, and it was not a deliberate or organised act by defendant Jethmir, but it was a immediate conflict between the two brothers. The prosecution itself admits that the late man has initially reviled and insulted defendant Jethmir and then passed on to concrete action, attacking him with dangerous means, such as Shati. This element presents a serious and essential indifference that cannot be overlooked, as it clearly shows that it is dealing with an escalating and immediate risk to the defendant's life. Under these circumstances, the defendant's action cannot be treated as an isolated act, but it should be analysed in the context of necessary protection or overcoming it - a question that will be subject to investigation during the investigation. As for the prosecution's claim of influence over witnesses, family members, such as parent and brother, mentioned. At this stage, there is no question at any moment how the defendant will influence them; these are general assumptions which cannot meet legal standards to limit one's freedom. We ask the Court to pronounce the measure of house arrest, as the two witnesses mentioned are the father and brother of the defendant and their testimony is painful in this case for the defendant and the entire family. Therefore, we ask that the prosecution's request for the detention assignment be rejected and that the most mild measure be determined, such as the house arrest”.
The defendant declared: I have nothing to add to the whole defense statement.












