Lawyer: Kadri Wessel has nothing to do with communiqués

During his statements in the concluding statement, the protection of Kadri Wessel, represented by Rodney Dixon, has said his client had no connection with the KLA communiques. He says the prosecution claims Wessel has helped distribute KLA statements, which have formed the backbone of collaborators' policies -- subsequently for [...]
He says the prosecution claims Wessel has helped disseminate KLA statements, which have formed the backbone of collaborators' policies -- subsequently for communiques and statements, the Justice Vow reports, broadcasts Periscope.
According to attorney Dixon, the prosecution claims Wessel has provided all the information reflected in these communiqués.
“All thing by Z The SP came from him, while there is no evidence point supporting this SPS claim”, he said.
He also said the prosecution has seen it necessary to establish links between Veselin and the communiques as the only way, according to them, to connect it to crimes.
It is necessary to establish this connection between Wessel and the communiques in some way because this is the only way it relates to crime. However, this is a depressing way of blaming my client and giving no evidence that supports and confirms it. The language that Z has used and formulated The SP is clear, it's general. Z The SP says that; Kadri Wessel received, assessed and broadcast, provided intelligent information that formed the base of the” communiqué, he said.
Dixon added that it is not clear what intelligent information is involved and who has been given this information.
“The ZPS does not explain for example whether Wessel designed, distributed, or provided for other parties these communiques. This is important because they are empty words. If you make such a claim, it is important to give facts and confirm such claims”, he said.












