Prosecutor seeks “sentence SASAM”, Lulzim of Naim Sa God-the defense act of free justice

In this case, Lulzim Sa God in the quality of the owner and director of the judicial subject “SA Same” sh.p.k and “SA Perëndia” sh.p.k, owner and shareholder 100 % Lulzim Sallah, are charged with “Kestuming and fraud in public procurement”, while defendant Naim Saum is being charged with “for falsification of documents”, reports “Betim for Justice”, broadcast Periscope.

The parties in the procedure gave the final word to the court in writing as they briefly released it.

Prosecutor Dren Paca said that the material and personal evidence that has been administered in the trial has unequivocally proven that the defendants committed the criminal acts they are charged with.

The prosecutor asked the Court to convict the accused and nominated the prison sentence, as well as the pronunciation of the supplementary sentence -- preventing the exercise of activity in public administration

On the other hand, the defender of accused Lulzim Saquu, lawyer Bahrie Besimi, rejected the prosecutor's final word Paca, stressing that this prosecutor has acted out of hurt competence in the case of her defense.

That, according to her, is the fact that public procurement fraud does not fall into the Special Prosecutor's compass when involved are not public officials.

Similarly, the lawyer Besimi demanded court release from the prosecution for her defense, arguing that there are no elements of the criminal act and no benefits have been achieved.

And defender of legal subject “AS SALA” sh.p.k, lawyer Daut Rudi asked the Court to issue a loose judgment on the case of the verdict.

The defender of accused Naim Sallah, on the other hand, lawyer Blerim Cela, stated that the indictment that charges his defense has nothing to do with him and that this prosecutor has failed to specify any special action to protect him.

So Cela proposed to the court that on the case of the verdict, accused Naim Sallah be released from the prosecution.

And the accused himself Lulzim and Naim Sallan demanded of the Court to make the right decision against them.

Otherwise, the Special Prosecutor of the Republic of Kosovo (PSRK), on November 3, 1923, has filed charges against the legal-company person “SA SAM” sh.p.k and two physical persons: Lulzim Sas God (the company's 100% shareholder) and to Naim Sa God.

Defendant Lulzim Sal God, in the quality of the owner and director of the judicial subject “SA Same” sh.p.k and “SAllahu” sh.p.k, owner and shareholder 100 % Lulzim Sallah, are being charged with “Kestus and public procurement fraud”, while defendant Naim Saum is being charged with “for falsification of documents”.

Actaza says defendant Lulzim Sa Godu and defendant “SA SAM” sh.p.k, owner and shareholder 100 % Lulzim Sallah, on September 5, 2019 in Pristina, in the quality of the owner of “SA God” sh.p.k., in the case of applying to public procurement procedures in the “Reconstrusion of R115 Regional Road, Prizren-Prevale”, published by the Ministry of Infrastructure, consciously, with the aim of fraud, as well as with the aim of influence in the decision of the Accounting Authority, so that his company “SAIEL” sh.g., announcing the winner of the contract for the project in question, had presented documents with false content, such as: CVs and references to N. M, I. F, B.K., and L.G.

According to the indictment, these references have been presented as evidence that the aforementioned were part of staff, committed respectively as company engineers, and that they had the necessary work experience required in announcing the contract.

Meanwhile, defendant Naim Saum in 2019, reportedly in order to enable his brother, defendant Lulzim Sallah, through the company “SAlah” sh.p.k, meet the terms of the Compacting Authority, respectively, the Ministry of Infrastructure, expressed in announcing the contract regarding the “Reconstruction of the R115 Regional Road, the Prizren-Prestable”, respectively, as if the same was in the composition of his experienced engineering staff, had compiled and signed the references cited as in the I device, with false content