Murati surprised by the statement of the Speaker of the Parliament: Constitutional Court Says All MPs Obliged to Vote

He has written on Facebook that the chief speaker belongs to the first party, therefore adds that anyone elected MP is worthy of such a position.

According to him, the opposition's interpretation and stance would inevitably lead the Parliament to another blockade, beyond repair.

The Kosovo Assembly is failing to elect the leader, the LVV has nominated Albulen Haxhiun, but the opposition calls him the split “, and Murati has responded to these opposition statements.

Full Mail of the Murat:

The opposition's stance and interpretation lead the Parliament to total blockades. Why?

The Speaker of the Parliament's post belongs to the winning party, so says the Constitution, and that has already been clarified with the interpretation of the Constitutional Court, which says all MPs are obliged to vote.

The constitution requires that only persons who have become MPs can be elected in the post of mayor and vice-presidents, so one cannot be elected who has not become an MP.

This suggests that each elected MP is eligible for the mayoral post, respectively, but that the discretion to propose which of the MPs is to the winning party, the proposal for which MPs become the deputy chairman of the Parliament belongs to the three largest parties.

So, just like it's not up to us to evaluate who they propose The LDK's PDK for the post of deputy chairman, as long as they meet the condition of being elected deputies, the same is true for the post of Speaker of the Parliament, the exclusive right to the proposal belongs to the LVV as the winning party, and as long as the condition of being elected MP is met, all MPs of the Parliament must vote, in accordance with the interpretation of the Constitutional Court.

Had it not been for the Vetevendosje Movement's proposal for the position of Chief Parliamentary, it could have been called blocking the process.

We have proposed the name, but the opposition is refusing to vote. So it becomes clear who's blocking the process.

If he insists that the burden of making 61 votes belongs only to the winning party, not to all MPs as the Constitutional Court has already said, then this kind of interpretation will immediately lead us to the next corner, where opposition parties fail to make the votes necessary for their proposals for the Parliament's deputy chairman.

Because if the security burden of 61 votes falls on each party, not all MPs as required by the Constitution, then when the winning party has 61 votes for the mayor's post, it means that opposition parties remain with only 59 votes or less, and with the same logic they will never succeed in electing the vice president of the Parliament.

Thus, the interpretation and attitude of the opposition would inevitably lead the Assembly into another blockade, beyond repair.

We as a winning party are interested in moving on. We also invite opposition parties to read the election results correctly, to respect the Constitution, unblocking the constitution's constitutionalisation process. /Periscope