Green's messages were appropriate: The three reasons that led to Kurt's decline, according to prominent American professor

Three reasons for the decline in Kurti's support: the economy in serious condition, strained relations with the United States of America, the nationalist card Kosovo Albanians may have seen more harmful than to have produced benefits.

These are the three views of Charles Kupchan, prominent professor and senior researchers at the Council for Foreign Relations (CFR), in connection with Albin Kurti's fall ten per cent in the February 9th parliamentary elections in Kosovo.

Kupchan articulated thin-e-hole in Greek media “Ecatimerin” All of Kosovo's landscape and perspective confronted the Western world and read it to Kurti, as he said, as “totally foolishly” The confrontational approach to the United States of America.

Furthermore, according to Charles Kupchan, Richard Green's orders “were relevant”.

This refers to messages in “X” of the latter that the United States relations are at the lowest peak in the last thirty-five years, since Kosovo had been a question for the US, respectively.

The three reasons for the decline, according to Kupchan:

One: “Kurti suffered the same fate as all those in government, which means, did not do much good. The good news for Kurti is that his party came first over 40%, which means it can stay in the office depending on whether it can establish any coalition”.

The first “is in the economy, and Kosovo's economy is not in good shape. There's a lot of poverty, low income per capita, and I believe this was the main rise in Kurti's popularity”.

Two: “The second factor played the nationalist card, got a hard line when it was in ethnic Serbs, closing down parallel structures, making numerous changes that in some ways have disturbed status-quon, and frozen dialogue with Serbia.

But more importantly for the average Kosovo voter, strained relations with the US and the EU.

And we know nationalism in general is a game that turns out, but for a small, vulnerable country like Kosovo, where people know they need help from abroad and in particular from the United States and the EU, and I can assume that people have asked themselves the question that was being asked, has this done us any good? So this, with the nationalist playing may have done more harm than it does”.

Three: “

Yerenelli recently made some warning remarks about Kurt, making it clear that he saw Kurt's confrontational political style as of no help. And now that it's someone like Trump, who's basically transitional, it could be the order for Kurt to take a more constructive stand, or it could pay a big price.

Low relationships? Can Kosovo without Washington?

Oh, no. And that goes from nine to nine in Yugoslavia... and the United States was the one who took the primatium with NATO and banned ethnic cleansing in Kosovo and took Kosovo to an independent state. You know, the US has hero status in Kosovo...

It is completely foolish for Kosovo leaders to take steps to conflict with Washington. Because at the end of the day the US is along with the EU, Kosovo's biggest future bet... in Euro-Atlantic institutions where Kosovo is targeting.

So the message that Yerenelli sent is also the right one.

I think it's possible that Kurt is going to have his attention now... and that now after the elections he may feel that he's going to play the nationalist's tupan, the way he did.

And, number two, assuming that it stands in power, will be with coalition partner ʹ and political spectrum in Kosovo has been critical of it...”