Prosecutor's Witness for KLA leaders in The Hague: I don't know why I'm invited to testify.

During his testimony at The Hague, witness Halim Berisha said he does not recognise the accused, there is nothing against them, and they do not know why the SPS has invited him to testify in this trial. I didn't know them, I absolutely don't know anybody, and I don't know why they've got me ftu”, said [...]
I did not know, I do not know the absolute, nor do I know the reason why they have me ftu”, the guest said at the hearing, reports “Justice Vow “.
Prior to that, in response to Thaci's defence questions, the witness claimed that he had twice called the Prosecutor to ask why he had to testify in this court process, since he had not understood the reason for such a thing.
He also claimed to have told Z. The SP's that he had no evidence against the accused because he had nothing against them and did not know them.
Very precise. I don't have anything on them, I don't know them. I don't know”, the Prosecutor's Witness said.
That is how Thaci's defence questions, represented by lawyer Nina Tavakoli, ended up asking Wessel's defence questions and lawyer Ann Rowan.












