Why will the number of witnesses be reduced at the Special Court?

Lawyer Skender Musa, in terms of the special court and witnesses process there, has said there are cases the prosecution also wants to give up hearing any witnesses. No matter which witnesses this case, there are cases where the prosecution seeks to [...]
Regardless of which witnesses are involved, there are cases where the prosecution wants to withdraw from hearing a witness, but it requires that his testimony given be considered as evidence,” Musa said at “Five”.
There is another method, according to Musaj, that the prosecutor entirely renounces the testimony given and that evidence is not examined by the court troops.
“Of course, witnesses proposed to read their testimony if they are against the accused and may be considered dangerous for defence should be rejected by defenders, Musa added.
As for the number of witnesses, Moses said they should be reduced.
The witness number has to be reduced because every person who's been willing to speak against KLA, I consider it taken as a witness for fear there will be no loan witnesses. From the beginning of the Special Court I thought that the number would be reduced, the number of witnesses who have no kind of information and can't prove anything, and the number of witnesses on the part of protection could be reduced. ”
The trial, according to him, is going to continue and is going faster.
While, Jevdet Thaci-chairman of the veterans' branch in Hasa has said the Special Court has prolonged.
The special court has been prolonged, we have voted it ourselves, and it's reasonable for us, the procedures that have continued 3 years to be held in detention should not be happening, because we set the example at The Hague Tribunal that a prime minister of ours resigned to face. ”
Which, according to him, has had to start over time and from within the W CK has been a rule, has been at a different level, disciplined and humane level.












