Supremeity narrows sentence to 22 years in prison for AKI murder

With this, the Supreme has changed the act of Foundation and Appeals, with which Iberdemian verdicts were sentenced to a unique 25-year prison sentence.

“ ... is only changed in terms of the legal appointment of the capital offense and the sentence, so that the Supreme Court of Kosovo finds that, in the actions of the V convict. I. described below the point of first-instance law enforcement device form elements of criminal murder, designed with Article 178 of KPRK, and therefore deems him to be prison terms for 18 years....” It says the Supreme decision.

In contrast, for criminal work “the kidnapping” and for possession without permission”, the third rate has confirmed the sentence pronounced against Iberdemaj. Hence, for all three criminal acts, the Supreme One has pronounced a unique sentence of 22 years in prison.

In the prison sentence, the accused will also be counted as the time spent in detention from September 4th 2019.

First, Foundation. March 18, 2022Iberdemjan had convicted him of criminal offence “grave murder” by 21 years, for “Rrombim” to 3 years in prison, and for “Non-licamental weapons” by 1 year and 6 months, thus pronounced a unique sentence of 25 years in prison.

This foundation decision, the Court of Appeals had generally approved.

Against the Act of Foundation and Appeals, the request for protection of legitimacy had exercised the defender of convicts, lawyer Besnik Berisha, due to violation of the Criminal Law and other violations of criminal procedure provisions.

Berisha had proposed that request be approved as a base, while rejected criminal acts “grave murder” be annulled and the subject turned into retrial at the first-degree court.

To the defense's request, the State Attorney has responded, with the September 18th 2023 parade, with the proposal that the request be refused as unfounded.

The third instance, however, found that the demand for protection of legitimacy is partly based.

The Supreme Court finds that the act of first degree, which has been confirmed by the second instance, does not contain substantial violations of the criminal procedure provisions alleged at the request. He also estimates that unfounded are claims that acts of two lower degrees rely on unacceptable evidence, referring to the country's monitoring report on the event

The Supreme decision states that the Foundation and Appeals have made misappreciated only with regard to the legal appointment of the criminal act of “Serious murder” and the appointment of the sentence for this work.

According to the Supreme decision, from the actual description of incredulous actions of the accused Iberdeaj does not respond to the legal appointment of a serious murder at the risk of the other person's life.

All of this, according to the Supremee, because the risk of the other person's life is not attributed to Iberdemaj for shooting so now to the deceased, but that risking the other person's life means the actions taken after the murder, which in concrete cases, the crime of kidnapping has been consumed.

Thus, this description does not indicate that the condemned in the case of a deceased person's life deprivation has put F. as the quality element that needs to be consumed by this criminal offence”, the decision says.

So, according to this Supreme Decision based on the video updates of the site and testimony of witness B.B., it turns out that the Iberdem's wish was to deprive the deceased of life now, but not risk the life of the witness.

Supreme in the case of resumption of criminal acts by “grave murder” in “Vrasje”, has also set a milder sentence and that 18 years in prison, with which the decision is reached by the awareness of others and the accused himself for failing to commit criminal acts in the future.

“In view of all the circumstances which have assessed the courts with the case of measuring the sentence, especially the fact that the criminal offense has been rescinded to a grossly milder criminal offence, this court convicted of rescinded criminal acts I pronounce the sentence of imprisonment in length of... years, while taking it as a confirmation of the penalty of imprisonment for non-lawing, conforming legal laws pronounced a unique sentence on the execution of this sentence in conviction that it is being punished with social danger and criminal acts and responsibility, and that it could be affected by the prevention of his actions in the future of criminal acts, but also in the detention of criminal acts of criminal acts, as well as such as the case.

According to the indictment set up on March 21, 2019, Valon Iberdemaj was charged with being jealous that on September 4, 2018, around 09:31, in the AKI facility in Pristina, he has now deprived the late Isa Sejdiu of life, as he was said to have already felt a day earlier in his lunchtime, jokingly telling AKI officials that he would supposedly become great, since those days were expected to be appointed deputy director of AKI.

At the risk of the life of now damaged F. B, while the deceased was in his workplace as a kitchen manager, the defendant went to the kitchen with a gun in his hand, called him by the name of “.”, and now the late man responded by saying “randno xhahram<3>, and the defendant immediately shot him twice at a distance of about three meters, struck him at the left of the chest and caused him the fatal wound, and then went to the yard with a gun, approached him, damaged his gun, and sent him to his head, and sent him to his car, which was located at AKI.

With this, he was accused of committing criminal work “grave murder”.

On the second device of the indictment, however, it is said that after committing a capital murder offense, the defendant kidnapped F. B, in a way that while damaged has been drinking coffee in the AKI yard, suddenly the defendant has come out of the weapon object in his hand and has approached him and has been forced to go to the defendant's car, which was parked in the AKI parking lot and put the gun to his head.

Then, according to the indictment, he ordered him to head towards the main exit gate of the AKI courtyard, just as he arrived at the main gate, there he even had his security members gunning, pointing to the words “, I killed the Chika”.

The indictment says he got out of the car, took the injured and kept the gun from it, and the other hand held it around his neck, walked out of the facility, and when he approached the door he went to the command to open the door and there he was prevented by official St. Sh, while official E. B, looking at that situation, it's on its knees to the defendant and it's directed to him with the word " <x0" if you want to kill someone, kill me”, and the defendant is said to have been addressed to him in the words “just gave you the gun” and then gave him the gun where he was released.

On that, he was accused of committing criminal work “The kidnapping”.

At the third point of the indictment, it is said that from the indefinite time of September 4th to September 2018, the defendant without authorization possessed the high-type weapon with which he committed the criminal act, while during the raid by members of the Kosovo Police, the suspect has also been located in his apartment and the revolution of the type <x0lt Amadeus ROSSI. /Betimy for Justice