24 minutes agoThe defendant in the case “Ban Vivant 1” says his father died as a result of rumors about the case
Periskopi(2 years ago)
(2 years ago)In the case of giving the final word to the accused in the case known as “Vivants 1”, Massar Gerdovci said his father had died in the wake of rumors about the case. “He expressed great regret over the case that happened to the U family... the gossip dispute has killed father”, said accused Gerdovci, reports “Betim for [...]
“He expressed great regret over what happened to the U family... the gossiping dispute has killed father”, said accused Gerdovci, reports “Battle for Justice”.
On the other hand, Gerdovci had a prayer for one of the owner of the bar “Ban Vivant”, the Ismajli Bridge to show where the local cameras are located, saying that if cameras go out the square then the whole truth will be exposed.
Similarly, the final word was given by the prosecutor, Armend Hamiti, who declared it an undeniable fact that one person died on the case of gunfighter and that the two accused jointly contributed to the carrying out of this criminal act.
Also, prosecutor Hamiti said that the court in the case of the pronunciation of the damage should take into account critical and extenuating circumstances, and the fact from managed evidence proves that the murder was not planned.
Meanwhile, the defender of the accused, Grgovci, said that in any trial held in this case, no one has been given an answer to who has fired on the critical day of gun and who, in turn, has been killed.
On the other hand, lawyer Rudari said the construction of the case by the prosecution has been wrong since a literal investigation has not been made to know the sect of all the details of the case, and demanding that, in the absence of evidence against Grabovci, a loose judgment be declared.
The final word was then given by other accused Sheriff Krasniqi, lawyer Haxhi Milaku, who said the late RR. He had beaten the two accused before the murder.
He also said that material evidence proves Krasniqi guilty of the criminal act of participating in beatings, but that it also turns out it must be released because the same has been signed after the case occurred 10 years ago.
The trial is later pronounced by the judge of the Avni Syla case.
After the complaints, the Court of Appeals had turned the case into retrial.
On December 18, 2020, the first - degree court of NW The retrial had again taken a condemnatory plea, so that accused Masar Gerdovci and Sheriff Krasniqi had convicted them of killing the guard at the bar “Bon Vivant”, condemning them to 24 years in prison (both).
In this regard, the Supreme Court had turned the case into retrial after, according to this insistence, accused Gerdovci and Krasniqi have been found guilty of actions that distinguish from what they are accused of.
The Act against Masar Gerdovci and Sheriff Krasniqi was established by the Founding Prosecutor in Pristina on July 7th 2015. They are said to have deprived the dead man of life at a joint level. U, thus committing criminal acts of serious murder and illegal possession.
After the complaints, the Court of Appeals had turned the case into retrial.
On December 18, 2020, the first - degree court of NW The retrial had again taken a condemnatory plea, so that accused Masar Gerdovci and Sheriff Krasniqi had convicted them of killing the guard at the bar “Bon Vivant”, condemning them to 24 years in prison (both).
In this regard, the Supreme Court had turned the case into retrial after, according to this insistence, accused Gerdovci and Krasniqi have been found guilty of actions that distinguish from what they are accused of.
The Act against Masar Gerdovci and Sheriff Krasniqi was established by the Founding Prosecutor in Pristina on July 7th 2015. They are said to have deprived the dead man of life at a joint level. U, thus committing criminal acts of serious murder and illegal possession.
