3 minutes agoKilled the groom, committed to Tush Frock
Periskopi(2 years ago)
(2 years ago)The Constitutional Prosecutor in Pec, on March 12, 2024, has filed an indictment against accused Tush Frocku for the serious murder in Cline against friend and son-in-law victim, A.P. It is being loaded for three other works, including “without permission”, “background” and “ownership of playable property”. Initial session in [...]
The initial session in this case is expected to be held at the end of March this year near the Foundation Court in Pec.
According to the indictment, Tush Frocku is being charged with having a life expectancy of A.P. on August 7, 2023, and with endangering the lives of other persons and the lives of the injured F.R.
Always according to the indictment provided by the “Justice Vow”, Tush Frock is charged with firing a gun seven times towards A.P., leaving him dead.
This is said to have committed criminal work “severe murder”, from Article 173 par.1 below par. 1.5 of KPRK.
Except for serious murder, Frock is also charged with illegal possession after being found with a ten - bullet gun gun, a belt of handgun equipment, pistol case, a metal rod, 13 rounds alive, two rounds of hunting rifle, gun cleaning equipment, and a knife.
According to the indictment, after committing a criminal offence, the accused Frock on a critical day appears at “Mother Teresa” Square, prevents the Golf VI car, which was damaged by A.T., where he also points his pistol to “Sig Sauer”, and under threat of gun pointing at him and forcing him to drive toward the village of Slugman. Always in accordance with the indictment, the injured had stopped the car and had left where the accused had later taken the car and fled. This reportedly committed criminal work “Conspiracy”, out of Article 192 par.2 below par.2.1 and 2.3 related to par.1 of KPRC.
The indictment also says that after stopping the car from being injured and driven away from the car, Frock takes the car and escapes where he leaves that car at his house, which in this act he is also charged with “taking possession of active property” from Article 319 par.1 of KPRK.
In the indictment prosecutor Ersan Qavolli has demanded that in the case of convicts' conviction as grave circumstances in the case of determining the sentence be taken on grounds, the manner of committing criminal acts, past criminal acts and defendants, family ties and defendants to the victim, the deceased had several times helped the defendants.
The accused Frockus was also sentenced to two acts of formal form, which, according to the indictment, had proved that one of the objectives of the sentence in his resocialisation had never been reached. “Battle for Justice”.
“Pristina Commandant expects” The competition for the square and monument of Adam Yashhar opens
