Learning who the Culture Ministry official is that “INSI” claims it influenced the three million tender of the “Adem Jashari”

The three million tender for the memorial complex “Adem Jashari” in Prekaz, is now completed at the Commercial Court. That's how he made it known through a media conference, Institute of Science and Technology lawyer “INSI” S.P. K, staying Arifi along with the consortium's representative, Ismail Battyar, writes Periscopi. Arifi has indicated in detail the filed indictment [...]
Arifi has indicated in detail the indictment handed down to the Municipal Court, where he claims a series of violations have been committed against them both by the Ministry of Culture, Youth and Sports, as well as by the Procuration Manager (OSHP).
Among other things, he also stated that a third party has had influence in the decision taken by the panel.







The Persian has learned exclusively, thus obtaining e-mail sent to O HOP, that person who “INSI” claims there was interference, It's a U.D. Ministry of Culture, Youth and Sports Secretary-General Xhedin Krasniqi.


Based on e-mail sent earlier by Mr. Krasniqi (see above), Periscop has sent questions to O The timeline to confirm the acceptance of this request and whether this can be viewed as interference or pressure in decision making, the same have turned this response;
“The EPS is referring to the same action, organ and ministerial dictatorship, we inform you that the Procureing Organization has accepted such a request, for a priority treatment of the subject, which is identified by sign No. 1042/2023, pertaining to the project described as above, but this has nothing to do with and is not considered intervention in the institutional independence of this body. And, as quoted by your medium, this is a requirement which consists exclusively of waiting for a party, for a process as effective as screening and deployment, which is presented in repeated cases by various institutions of state administration at the local and central level, when they are presented by the quality of contracting authority. Such demands have not only been exercised by such institutions, but also by economic operators, whose exercise in the judicial context is described as the act of a party for this Organ to act effectively, as in the sense of LPP Article 104. So requests such as this in the concrete case, without any need for other comments have nothing to do with or are considered any interference in the decision-making process, regardless of who the prime minister, minister, mayor of a municipality or whoever is”, Says the answer of O Periscop EMS.
Periscope today will publish a summary article of the entire procedure suspected of flagrant wrongdoing in the project for the “Adem Jashari” in Prekaz. /Periscopi/Enis Rrustemi/
Read also:
Clear violation of the project for the “Adem Jashar” in Prekaz, 3 million tender suspended
Clear violation of the project for the “Adem Jashar” in Prekaz, 3 million tender suspended










