Released Gezim Svechla, Court Refuses Request for ordination of house arrest against him

The Foundation Court in Pristina, the General Department for Criminal Affairs, has rejected the Constitutional Prosecutor's request in Pristina for the appointment of house arrest to Vetevendosje Movement asembilist chief Gzim Svecla, deciding that the same will be protected in freedom. Svecla is suspected of criminal activity “Distraction or damage to property”, [...]
Svecla is suspected of criminal activity “Disillusion or damage to property”, in the case of the microphone demining at the Municipal Assembly in Pristina, reports “Justice Vocation“.
The preliminary procedure judge has reportedly rejected the Pristina Constitutional Prosecutor's request for the appointment of house arrest measure and the defendant is released to be protected in freedom.
“The court after hearing the parties and analyzing the Constitutional Prosecutor's request in Pristina for the appointment of house arrest measures found that the request for the appointment of house arrest measures for the G.S. defendant. It is unfounded and goes beyond the goal of ensuring the presence of defendants in the procedure, preventing the rerun of criminal acts and for successful implementation of the procedure, and since conditions for the appointment of the proposed move have not been met, nor of any other softer extent, the court ruled that the defendant G.S. to protect itself in freedom”, says the announcement.
Also, the announcement notes that the purpose of the previous measures at Article 171 of the Criminal Procedure Code is to ensure the presence of defendants in the procedure, preventing the rerun of criminal acts and the successful implementation of the procedure, and that these measures do not present punishment for the suspected person of committing a criminal act.
“There is a doubt that the defendant, based on the 09.24 date of 09.2024 around 10:45, in the Pristina Community Assembly Hall, the moment the members of the Assembly of the municipality leave the hall for a holiday (pause), the defendant G.S member of the Pristina Community Assembly, with the intention of cutting off the Assembly Assembly of the Assembly of the Assembly, and that as the agenda point was the adoption of the Pristina Council's 2025 budget, has deliberately damaged the property of the other person (phone) respectively, with the owner of the Parliament's Parliamentary Assembly, with damage to the Commission's property, and the country's damage to the town of Pristina, the KOCHOCHOCLCHOC, has been said in the government.
Against this act, disgruntled parties have the right to complaint at the Court of Appeals, through the Constitutional Court in Pristina.












