<x0)

At the beginning of the session, Judge Hasan Kryeziu has indicated that the indictee is not present at this session and that even though he has been regularly invited, the absence has not reasoned, reports the “Justice Vowtim”.

At the hearing, the prosecution's representative “Nic” was present, lawyer Reka Rekay Nezaj-Shehu, who has declared that she remains on the whole behind claims filed in the indictment.

She added that the plaintiff has protected its trading brands, that is, the word “Nic “, the sign of “”, and the brand “Air Jordan” figuratively near the Agency for Industrial Property (API), which means that the plaintiff can bring its rights into line with the Law on Trade Market Marks <1>.

The same has also asked the court that after holding the main review hearing, the court's case will be filed.

Since lawyer Nezaj-Shehu had no new evidence to deliver or any other statements, Judge Kryeziu found that today's hearing was over.

The next session is scheduled for April 15, 2023.

Otherwise, according to the August 19th 2021 indictment, plaintiff “Innovate” has indicted NT “NBB” /Dren Radoniqi, due to violation of the trade brand. The plaintiff is a multinational American corporation engaged in design, development, production and marketing worldwide, selling shoes, clothing, equipment, access, and services.

The indictment stresses that the plaintiff has the commercial brand “Nic” registered worldwide, including brands that are valuable in Kosovo.

On the other hand, the indictee reportedly is an individual business registered in Kosovo by the name of Dren Radoniqi B.I. and the trade name NT “NBB”, which was banned on August 2nd 2021 by Dogan, importing 1,000 and 400 backpacks carrying the plaintiff's registered brands.

On this basis, the plaintiff is asking the court to prove that through the import of 1,000 and 400 bags, the indictee has violated the plaintiff's commercial brands, the brand “Nicus”, the figurative brand and the brand “Air Jordan”, valid on Kosovo territory respectively.

Also, he has asked the court to impose the indictee on him to crack his upper bags at his expense, in the seven-day term from taking the plea, threatening to meet the mandatory.

On the other hand, it is said that in the event of failure to comply, the indictee is obliged to repay the plaintiffs all expenses caused to organise the destruction of goods.

In the indictment, the plaintiff also wants to be charged with covering all storage expenses under the bill of 1,000 and 400 bags, despite their amount.

Also through the indictment, the plaintiff requires that any import, storage, sale, sale, or other distribution of goods be prohibited, which without authorization carry identical elements or similar to the plaintiff's registered commercial brands, and also pay all the cost of the procedure.