The trial clears the verdict: Berisha was not violated, the groom was released because there is no danger of escape

Former Albanian Prime Minister Sali Berisha's claim that the SPAK should receive authorisation from the Parliament for the measure of security against him has been invaluable in the evidence. In the white-lighted decision during the day by the Court of Appeals, which the exclusively available Top Channel, the court recalls the constitutional changes of 2012, the shield or immunity of MPs, and [...]
Former Albanian Prime Minister Sali Berisha's claim that the SPAK should receive authorisation from the Parliament for the measure of security against him has been invaluable in the evidence.
In the white-lighted decision during the day by the Court of Appeals, which the exclusively available Top Channel, the court recalls the constitutional changes of 2012, the shield or immunity of MPs, and the concept of invulnerability, which in Berisha's case has not been violated by the SPAK nor by the first scale.
The Appeals Court in Albania, explains that the act of obligation announced to Berisha is an austerity power that does not remove the complaint's personal or physical freedom, Sali Berisha, but only the freedom of his movement abroad.
This move, obliging the MP to appear before judicial police on days and hours, under the appeal, does not require authorisation of the Republic of Albania's Parliament, says Judge Iliriana Olldashi, Top Channel broadcast Klankosova.tv.
The court explains that the parliamentary <x0 community is not a personal privilege of deputies, but guarantees that each of them can freely exercise its mandate without being exposed to arbitrary political persecution, said in the hazy decision, clarifying that MP Berisha's personal freedom would have been affected in the event that the dismissal of freedom by court ruling was implemented; the order of the prosecutor's ban, the ban by judicial police, the arrest in Fagrance <x1, which has not occurred.
This explanation refutes one of Berisha's cards for the Partizan file that has insisted through lawyers and on appeals that obtaining a authorisation makes the move declared because of its political beliefs discriminating.
The court has also rejected the consideration of Berisha and his son-in-law, Jamarber Malltezi, that Irena Gjona was biased and that they were unable to defend themselves.
“Even from the two International Conventions, the Pala States of which is the Republic of Albania, is reduced to corruption is one of the most serious acts of abuse of office, which goes out of the law, for a dishonest benefit, that can personally take public office, or a third related to a function of official power, the Court adds to AVelx, the Avkos broadcast.
According to Iliriana Olldashi, by trading “ ” the authority he has been entrusted with, the official or senior public official, not only the specific duties of his function, but he betrays clean and socially. Typically envisioned criminal work by Article 260 of the Penal Code becomes even more serious when doubt of its conduct is placed on the executive leader, as has been the case at the time of the incident attorney Sali Berisha, argues.
Judge Olldashi explains why she softened the move towards the former prime minister's son-in-law, sending Malltesy from prison to house. The court finds that there is no danger of escape. After the verdict is cleared, the SPAK is expected to hand over the withdraw to the Supreme Court.












