Court's decision: A month of detention for four detainees for the robbery in Suhareka

The Constitutional Court in Prizren has assigned the detention measure to the four arrested in connection with the robbery committed at the silversmithy “diakos” in Suhareka. “I B.B., 2 / 1 B.I., and III. L.C., due to the suspicion that there are criminal offenses in co-ordination by Article 374 pars. 1 of the Republic's Penal Code [...]
“B.B., 2 / 1 B.I., and III. L.C., due to the suspicion that there are criminal offenses in co-ordination by Article 374 pars. 1 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kosovo. And, T.B., because of suspicion, it's been carried out on the basis of criminal possession, in control or unauthorized possession of weapons by Article 366 pars. of the KP”, the report says.
The defendants B.B., B.I., and L.C., on November 22nd, at 15:45m in the city of Suhareka, exactly at the Silver Department “Diacos 2“, with the use of force and serious rowing to attack the other person's life or body by acting as members of the armed group, seize the active property of other damaged T.B. and A. B: in order to bring themselves and the other members of the illegal property benefit group, so that the defendants B.B., B.I., K.G., D.G., and L:C., all dressed up in black clothes and gloves on hands, all equipped with long frontal weapons, one of them with long arms in their hands perform the guard's role as others enter into the silversmith and under the threat of weapons they take hostage to the local owner who binds with a plastic line to resistance and then start robbing gold, with gold, where they get to lose gold, and where they get to the gold-definishing, and then to the chrusiculus, and to the village, they take it's defiction. The defendant, T.B., dated November 30th, 1923 in Pristina, right at the T.B., during the police's search of the house, by order of the preliminary procedure, police have found a (1) Zorki gun, black model M-906-T 9mm, and a 7.62 calibre bullet. X 39mm and six rounds of 7.6m calibre and BS End B, which the defendant held in ownership and possession, contrary to the Law on Weapons”, is said to be further in the statement.












