6 minutes agoPSD: KKP law to go Constitutional, power aims for control
Periskopi(4 years ago)
(4 years ago)The Social Democrat Party, through a communiqué for the media, has said the law for the Kosovo Prosecutorial Council must go to the Constitutional Court. From this party, they have said that legal changes in the system of justice have been followed by anti-corruption discours, of the <x0-directibility of citizens is high and the need for significant reforms”. But according to them, the “Namer [...]
From this party, they have said that legal changes in the system of justice have been followed by anti-corruption discours, of the <x0-directibility of citizens is high and the need for significant reforms”. But according to them, the common “denominator of these changes is to establish political control over the mechanisms of the system”.
“Legal changes to the justice system have been followed by anti-corruption disks. Civic sensitivity is high, even the need for considerable reform. But the common denominator of these changes is establishing political control over the system mechanisms. Three laws are in the process of completing the change, each of them received serious remarks from the Venice Commission, while the Government lied about the green light it has received for “reform””, said the communiqué.
The PSD estimates that the main conflict over the KPK law is the composition of the council and the report among members prosecutors rather than prosecutors, while saying that since the first draft of the bill has been noted the goal of power for control.
The key conflict about the KKP Law is the composition of the Council and the report among members of prosecutors rather than prosecutors. Since the first draft of the bill, the purpose of power for control has been noted, envisioning a majority council delegated by politics. After Venice's remarks, the strategy changes. Now the political envoys are few, but rightly veto. Amanda 9 delivered to second reading seals the influence of non-prosecutor members towards those coming from the prosecutorial system. With the current version, decision-making on important issues of this Council (vote for the Chief Prosecutor of State, Prosecutors and Disciplinary Affairs) will be conditioned by political will, respectively, by the non-prosecutor members of this body”.
In the end, The PSD says the ombudsman is the institution that can address the Constitutional, but none of the institutions address it.
The ombudsman is the institution that can address the Constitution when issues like this are of importance to citizens and their rights, but none of the institutions address the Constitutional.
