Appeals Court Burys Jail Sentence to Indictees for Injing Ramush Haradinaj's grandson

This is after Appeal has approved the Peja Prosecutor's complaint and increased his prison sentence to 3 years and 8 months and 800 euros in fines.

Such a decision has been made by the College of Appeals Judges, composed of President Jevdet Abazi, with members Aferdita Bytyqi and Kreshnik Radoniqi.

Until the harshness of the sentence on Lajqi, according to Apel was after the Peja Court had pronounced a mild sentence overestimating extenuating extenuating extenuating extenuating extenuating extenuating extenuating extenuating extenuating circumstances, while difficult circumstances were not objectively assessed.

“Colegi estimates that the circumstances discussed above have not been given any significance in determining the sentence, and the same influence that the sentence be harsher and not at minimum borders, college concludes that the first instance court has assessed only extenuating circumstances, weighing them in determining the sentence that has resulted in a decision on the penalty that does not respond to the prospect of reaching the goal of the” sentence, in the court's argument that Apelit has.

Appeal argues that despite the fact that even the noble accused had admitted guilt, repented, and reconciled to the damaged family, these circumstances do not justify the proclamation of a mild sentence.

This, since according to Apel, the Peja Court had failed to assess the fact that the defendant had committed three dangerous criminal acts, shooting the injured Mustaf and wounding even one random passersby.

These circumstances have been overestimated, after college assessment, especially in connection with the accused, F.L. has committed three criminal acts, which present high risk and capacity for serious damage to people's lives and health, shooting three times at the outside of the M.A. Which he struck with two bullets and caused severe bodily injuries, while one missile hit the passinger of the T.Q. case. and caused severe bodily injuries”, says Appeal's reasoning.

While the defendant's claims -- lawyer Guzim Kolqak -- had failed to assess the fact that his defense had been provoked by the injury, Appel called that claim generalised by rejecting him as unfounded.

While for Democratic defendant Lajqi, who because of the act of the attack has been sentenced to 200 euros in fines by the Peja Court, Apeli has received this sentence as evidence.

Otherwise, the Constitutional Court in Pec on March 4th, 2021 had pronounced an effective prison sentence against the prominent Lajqi defendants for the criminal offence of attempted murder, the cause of general danger and pale weapons, since the same had pleaded guilty.

According to the trial pronounced by the chairman of the court, Sami Shardaku, the defendant Lajqi for attempted murder was tried by 15 months in prison, due to the general risk of 10 months in prison, and 800 euros in fines for side bearings, reports the “Justice Vowtim”.

By implementing provisions of unique punishment, Lajqi's sentence was submitted to one year and eight months in prison and 800 euros in fines and seizures of the weapon.

And the accused Democrat Lajqi was sentenced to 200 euros in fine for the criminal act of the attack, which he will pay within the 30-day deadline.

Otherwise, according to the indictment set up on December 14, 2020, by the Pec Constitutional Prosecutor, Lajqi is charged that on October 10, 2020, around 12:15, on the “Eliot Engel” street, he deliberately attempted to deprive the life of the injured Mustaf Ahmetxekaj.

According to the prosecution, on the morning of the critical day, first injured Mustafe vertebrates with the noble defendant and witness Nazmi Lajqi at the bar “Dukeskaja” in Pec, because the noble defendant had insulted Ramush Haradinaj (who was injured by Musa's uncle), so that the same day, while witness Nazmi was entering the car of the caravan near his business faculty, prohibited by the massacre of his type Porchete, damaged by the car, and damaged by the first-person, and the first-person, the next time he had been injured by the driver's car, the <2ndoculocul. TT”, at close proximity and backward, shoots three times toward the injured, where two bullets cause serious bodily injury.

Gent Lajqi is also accused of criminal acts of causing general risk and gym weapons by acting as described in the indictment device.

Democratic defendant Lajqi is accused of using force against the injured Mustaf on the critical day, as the defendant sees the victim injured near witness Nazmi, who has an uncle's son, approaches the same and then hits him in the head with fists and leaves the scene.

What did he do in the case of “Attack”, from Article 184 par.1 of KPRK.