VV idealologist calls “-Albanian” Kosovars who love Kosovo state

He has named the <x0nd border plant” and the Albanian “” all Kosovo Albanians who believe it should continue with the statehood of Kosovo and with the reinforcement of the permanent character of that citizenship.

Instead, Feraj, although in power, continues to support the idea of a one-ethnic state that would include all Kosovo Albanian and Kosovo citizens, Periscope follows.

Therefore, convinced that he reasons correctly, he also requires that our conscience and its resulting actions be guided by justice: the border of 1913! Among other things as the criterion of being “external” or “internal <x3x4> for us and our political action.” writes Mr. Feraj.

Feraj has failed to become an MP in the V legislature III of the Kosovo Assembly for very few votes.

Last weekend's Vetevendosje has been in Albania to support the party's parliamentary candidates there.

Full status:

Border guards:

The sanctification of the border set in London by 1913 is the sanctification of Kosovo's conquest by Serbia.

That invasion is sanctified by anyone who speaks today of Kosovo intervention “in internal affairs” of Albania, or of Albania's intervention “in internal affairs” of Kosovo.

Within the national conscience there is no “ ” and “ata”, along the margins of 1913.

Within the nation there are no Albanians who can be reproved for interfering with internal affairs... To his nation?

Regardless of where you live, in Kosovo or Albania, in the US or in Croatia, and regardless of political positions, civil or lack of them, each member of the Albanian nation is internal to it, with full and equal rights and obligations.

2 / 1

Unfair is intervention in our internal affairs by those who have renounced belonging to the Albanian nation and see themselves as foreigners.

Only those who have taken themselves out of the Albanian nation can formulate “the thought” absurd: “The changes in Albania do not come from outside”, when the changing movement participates Albanians outside the borders of 1913, or dedisposed around the world even its keepers of those borders.

Only the keepers of the 1913 border advise Albanian politicians to view the fragmentation of Albanian lands as a gift given by Serb invaders, that “work each in their own garden”!

Should each also see the corresponding part of Albanians as its own employees donated by Serbia?

Of course, both foreigners and the oppressed by the Albanian nation have the right to give us advice. But we have even more the right to reject their advice about the sanctification of Serbian injustice to us.

3 / 1

Today's guards of the 1913 border want to deepen the injustice of the decision then:

In London physical division of the Albanian land and nation was physically imposed.

In the decisions of London, there is no obligation to bring in our consciences of those borders.

The introduction of that border to the conscience of Albanians (Asimimili) has been and remains the will and political practice of Serbian chauvinism and Albanian Serbs.

Rangers of the 1913 border want our conscience to be guided by that limit as the right criterion for what we are allowed to think is right or unfair, what we are allowed to do or not do, what we are permitted or forbidden to think of ourselves and our political actions.

London recognized that border as the right and reward of the winner of war.

While the former Albanian, who has referred to that border in his conscience, has already amended it as the right to conscience or to reason the justice of the Serbian occupation of Kosovo in the Balkan wars of 1912.

Therefore, convinced that he reasons correctly, he also requires that our consciences and actions that stem from it be guided by righteousness - the border of 1913! Among other things as the criterion of being “external” or internal “” for us and our political action.

But for the victim of Serbian war, which we were, that limit has been and remains unfair. On the plains of reason, he even named him President of the Conference of London, Sir Edward Gray.

(published yesterday, on Street)