Shpend Ahmeti tells the people about Kurt's slips: Your policy will only increase prices

Ahmeti, in a Facebook post, has shown the slips in Prime Minister Kurti's current speech, which, among other things, accused the past government of granting subsidies to “to the biggest beneficiaries of the pandemic. ”

“Credit for government economic growth, guilt for rising prices of tradesmen don't pick one! ” writes Ahmeti, passes Periscope.

He argues that if subx0 consumer growth when production stops has increased prices” then government policy for 300 euros for consumer loans will increase prices even more.

Furthermore, economist Shpend Ahmeti claims it will benefit banks, who are also not damaged by pandemic.

In the end, he has given some advice about Kurt as to what to do next.

Full and undisputed status:

The government's credit for economic growth, the blame for rising prices of the tradesmen won't go for one!

If price hikes are a consequence of the pandemic, rising consumption when production has been stopped at least 300 euros' policy on consumer loans by the government only increases prices for less production.

If others were wrong when they gave them the supermarkets “the biggest benefit of the pandemic” then how is the subvention or motivation of citizens for credit? Millions of profits for banks that are certainly not the biggest losers in the economy?

The last question: what is real economic growth in Kosovo this year when inflation (princing growth is 4.9)?

The conclusion is, leave the boasting with economic growth and then come bills like inflation. He's not a smart guy. In a country like Kosovo where we import nearly anything we consume and where we don't have monetary policies, most indicators are imported, including prices.

Reinstructuring is the main policy in the absence of budgetary power, economic power and productivity. Other policies that could have real impact on the economy on best scenario show results in the period 6-10 years.

So the focus should be on protecting endangered citizens/groups, helping endangered businesses, as well as stimulating investments. The others are bullshit for daily consumption.

Three examples:

1. Citizens' designated quotas for electricity (such as France)
2. Help for weak links in the supply chain for local producers. If there is more money in circulation, the local manufacturer should have the best place in both the supermarket and government menus.
3. Funds equal grants with the amount of investment for specific economic areas identified as strategic.