Krasniqi's lawyer is familiar with the Special: You're keeping a 70-year-old retired in prison, you've made order.

Former KLA spokeswoman Jakup Krasniqi's lawyer, Venkateswari Alagedra, is demanding that through Special Court Court Appeals' Special Chambers, she provides release from her client's custody. It has sent counterargument to court against prosecution claims to continue detention of Krasniqi, the news writes. One of the points where it's focused [...]
It has sent counterargument to court against prosecution claims to continue detention of Krasniqi, the news writes.
One of the points she's focused on is the “repetition of criminal acts”, which is commonly used as argument by the Prosecutor in the event of a defendant released from custody.
“Applying the right test for facts, Article 41 (6) (b) (i) is satisfied only if there is the danger that Mr. Krasniqi to repeat the indictment - persecution, imprisonment, torture, other inhuman acts, murder or forced disappearance or war crimes of arbitrary arrest, mistreatment, torture or murder. I don't understand. There is no continuing armed conflict or widespread / systematic attack on a civilian population. This interpretation would not send down Article 41 (6) (b) (ii), since DSK's jurisdiction is not limited to international crimes”, Alagedra says in her parliaments.
She goes on to say that the Pre-Precience Procedure Judge and the Specialised Prosecutor missed “legally” when they concluded that Krasniqi could repeat alleged crimes and mentioned in the indictment.
The Alagedra also mentions past time in custody of Jakup Krasniqi, which is approaching the 365-day, as well as inaccurate deadlines given by the Specialised Prosecutor's Office to start the trial.
According to her, staying in custody for such a long time conflicts with the principle of presuming innocence.
Krasniqi's lawyer is being very tough with the Prosecutor and Court, noting that former spokeswoman The KLA is 70 years old and it cannot transmit information to someone or communicate with him even under the measure of conditions.
According to the argument she makes, the Special Krasniqi detention has already turned “rule” and not into “exception”, writes the news away.
“The DSK was created to protect fundamental rights and ensure fair criminal proceedings, including the detention regulation. Mr. Krasniqi must be justified on the basis of his individual merits. The rare argument in the controversial decision is insufficient to justify the continuation of the ban on a 70-year-old retired man who is supposedly innocent and who has already been imprisoned for eight months without personally seeing his family. If you're the spectator of Mr. Krasniqi could transmit information to someone despite imposing strict conditions, it is sufficient to deny provisional release, then detention has ceased being exempt and has become a rule. Mr. Krasniqi must be released”, she has written on her appeal.
Significantly, Krasniqi's appeal has been partially accepted by the Special Appeal.
The accepted part of the ex-KLA spokeswoman's appeal concerns guarantees given by Kosovo Police that she is willing to monitor the conditions under which the release from custody is accepted.
The news.net reported yesterday that Police Director Samedin Mehmeti has not provided sufficient guarantees for the release of former KLA officials, and that he may be questioned for this by the Special Pre-Professional Judge, who will ask him in detail about the capacities of the Kosovo State Police Force.












