3 minutes agoSelim Selimi defends Melza Haradinaj when discussed with law
Periskopi(6 years ago)
(6 years ago)Selim Selimi in Debat Plus has discussed the sentence of Melisa Haradinaj, where, as the two parties have already mentioned in the coalition, where they have said there will be no people with the indictment. Selimi in the debate defended Melza Haradinaj, saying she has legal means to disagree with the decision [...]
Selimi in a debate protected Melza Haradinaj, saying she has legal means not to comply with the court ruling and that these means can be legitimate, Periscopi follows
You can find the complaint where Melis sent it to the apple. Melza Haradinaj disagrees with the first-instance court ruling. As long as we don't have a decision of shape. Her argument to disagree with that could be legitimate. Melisa has legal means to disagree with the court's decision on the first instance”, he said/Periscopi
