Following US threat, Kurti is preparing Thaci's literature course with NATO for the Constitutional Court

From sources within the Government it is taught that Prime Minister Albin Kurti has decided to address the issue these days at the Constitutional Court.

It seems Prime Minister Kurti is in the quest to open up domestic political topics to avoid arguing about confronting the US on the fee.

This letter by former Prime Minister Hashim Thaci with the former KFOR commander in Kosovo and former Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, Kurti had interpreted the secret “agreements at the expense of Kosovo.

In 2013, Kosovo institutions led by the Thaci Government were making a strategic review of the security sector, where among the highlights of this revision was the 10-year transformation of KSF into the Kosovo Armed Forces through constitutional changes.

At that time, NATO agreed with this constitutional change, but called for pledges from Kosovo institutions that will not make Kosovo's military landing in the country's north without an agreement with NATO during this transition period.

Similarly, Kosovo Constitution at Article 153 [The International Military Presence], the chairman of the International Military Presence, respectively, KFOR Commander, who responds directly to NATO Secretary General, credits the final authority in the operational zone with interpreting NATO's duties, according to Ahtisaari's package.

Whatever the other provisions of this constitution, the International Military Presence has the mandate and competencies defined by relevant international instruments, including UN Security Council Resolution 1244 and the General Proposal for Kosovo Status Resolution, March 26th 2007. The head of the International Military Presence, in accordance with the Comprehensive Proposal for the Kosovo Status Resolution, March 26th 2007, is the final authority in the operational zone in terms of interpreting those aspects of the agreement mentioned refer to the International Military Presence. No authority of the Republic of Kosovo has any jurisdiction to review, reduce or otherwise limit the mandate, competencies and obligations referred to in this sub”, says under the Constitution of Kosovo.

Even in the Kosovo Declaration of Independence itself, it is clearly stated at 5th point that we invite and welcome an international civilian presence to oversee the implementation of the Ahtisaari Plan and a European Union-led rule of law mission.

“NATO to retain the lead role in the international military presence and implement the responsibilities granted to the UN Security Council Resolution 1244 and the Ahtisaari Plan, until the Kosovo institutions are able to assume these responsibilities. We will fully co-operate with these presences in Kosovo to ensure peace, prosperity and stability in the future in Kosovo”, the Declaration of Independence of the Republic of Kosovo says.

Moreover, the document Kosovo's own independence was announced very clearly defines the role of the international military presence in Kosovo.

Ahtisaari Plan article 13 presents role and mandate NATO in Kosovo and the superiority this international force has in relation to local security institutions, where neither KFOR military intervention to eliminate any obstacles they may face during the implementation of its mandate in Kosovo.

While, on the xI annex of this same plan, there are also in detail the tasks and responsibility KFOR has in Kosovo.

The same day Kurt had raised this issue in public, claiming that Thaci had committed constitutional violations, he had also called attention to the institutional need to coordinate with Thaci for foreign policy.

Even these days when Kurt is sending Thaci invitations for meetings, he is appearing interested in co-operating with him on one side, while on the other he is fighting politically even with his political vows, without any legal burden, to the Constitutional Court.