Subtitles:

He has said in Info Magazine of Kosovo that it is disappointing that even after so many years Kosovo will face such a topic. According to him, Kosovo leaders have not been willing to find a solution to show Interpol that those arrest warrants are political.

Very painful that in 2019 we still have such themes. There is no readiness either on Interpol's side or on our institutions so that those warrants are definitely cancelled as <x1-political “ ”, done in a completely different context, and they have nothing to do with the real work of Interpol”.

It is absurd that KLA leaders fear every time they cross the border, because a political warrant can be activated. We remember what happened to Ramush Haradinaj in France earlier this year, but there is neither will on the part of Kosovo, but neither from Interpol to finally settle this matter”.

“Some sort of institutional agreement must be reached with Interpol to define these are political warrants, not based on objective judicial actually. The warrants for former KLA superiors have been APUlanco for the period of war context, but now it is meaningless to go to Brussels and talk about improving reports with Serbia while these warrants still exist. Our attention turns towards them only when cases occur. It's disappointing”

In addition, political analyst Artan Muhhaxhiri also pointed to the recent problem facing Kosovo if the Interpol membership application is made, Klen Kosova reports.

Haradinaj's “statement appeared more reserved because he said the application is optional, so we can apply, but we can not even apply unless there are enough votes, as happened last time. That situation was a major despair for Kosovo”.

“should not be applied unless”

We need to be realistic, there's no room for creating useless, unbashed euphoria, and fail at the end of”.

Muhariri said in Info Magazine that there was no transparency in the dialogue between Kosovo and Serbia, but the routine designed to travel to Brussels and to appear in press conferences.

The main problem with dialogue in Brussels has been that there has been no transparency or any target final points, no deadlines... Months have passed, years, but substantial progress has not been made. Neither Thaci nor Vuciqi nor the EU have shown transparency, and this has enabled the creation of a blurry for misinterpretation”.

Our “Diplomacy is extremely fragile, extremely politicised, with numerous shortages in professional aspects. Right lobbie strategies have been lacking so far, and therefore have also begun to increase challenges to Kosovo's citizenship. Politically, Serbia is taking great advantage of this situation. Unfortunately, some of our main allies have internal problems: America has co-operation with Trump, Britain is in trouble with BRUX, Germany is in transition after Chancellor Merkel's announced departure, so circumstances are not what they were before a few years.

Muhajiri argued that the tax issue has shifted from the initiative's goal.

“Taxa has been good at first. It was a state but emotional response to Serbia's activities, which institutionally decided to develop and finance the anti-Kosovo lobby. But this tax cannot go on for a long time, it must be transformed”.

“Well, there was a symbolic quartering of Serbia, about the time it was set”.

But in the Balkan political reports, such acts cannot last long, because if everyone starts these radical steps then we go back to 1991”.

Our “Aleates offer us the opportunity to ask for something to remove the tax, any written guarantee that Serbia will no longer lobby against or speed up visa liberalisation”.

<x0)

He added that the 100% tax on Serbian products and those from Bosnia and Herzegovina has turned into a personal cause for Prime Minister Ramush Haradinaj, which has blocked dialogue and international participation in it.

The subx0> The internationals have realised that Haradinaj will not accept anything offered as counterweight for tax evasion, at no cost to”.

“Taxa has not damaged Serbia much economically, because Kosovo is not as decomminative in terms of exports of this state”.

“The way the dialogue was developed made an impression in Washington, Brussels and Berlin that thus can be continued indefinitely”.

That way of dialogue was turned into routine, but in fact all participants have been satisfied with that approach both [Thaci and Vuciq] have considered international kindness, because they are seen as “good guys”, not problem. The tax has destroyed this status quo. It is not expected that Ramush Haradinaj will be so persistent to this extent.