Agron Demi asks: Has the Haradinaj government hurt Serbia more than 100%, or Kosovo by eating 100%?

Analyst Agron Demi from the GAP Institute has compared the effects tax has brought upon Kosovo and Serbia. According to his comparison, more was economically damaged by Kosovo by thieves than Serbia with a 100 per cent tax. His full post: Does the Haradinaj government more harm Serbia economically and politically with the tax [...]
According to his comparison, more was economically damaged by Kosovo by thieves than Serbia with a 100 per cent tax.
His full post:
Has the Haradinaj government hurt Serbia more economically and politically on a 100% tax, or Kosovo 100% maln?
Effects on Serbia:
An average of 36m euros in losses per month, or about 152m euros so far.
Strengthening Serbia's international position towards Kosovo.
Effects on Kosovo:
A 50m-euro lost from water bottlers;
A further 53.1m euros for Bechtel& Enka
37m euros a year for fraud veterans;
A 6m-euro loss of cash collection due to delays in doing work on the highway;
Hundreds of millions of euros in multi-year losses from scandalous contracts for T construction C Kosova e Re;
Millions of euros in misappropriations for deputy ministers' salaries, political advisers, co-ordinators, overemployment...
The further degradation of Kosovo's foreign policy.
Taking mutual action against a country to fight at every step is right action. But the use of a 100% tax, as a cover for 100 percent malpractice, is much greater damage this Government is doing to Kosovo.









