The prosecution demands an increased sentence on Agim Ademi, defence says it is becoming <x0 war>” to occupy the post at FFK

Such a request was presented before a second-instance court college, Ademi's defender, lawyer Besnik Berisha, at the session that was held Tuesday.

Release from the case's charges or retrial has demanded from Apel even the other indictee's defender in the case, Muharrem Rama, lawyer Ramiz Krasniqi.

On the other hand, the Constitutional Prosecutor in Pristina has proposed to the second degree court that, against Adam and Rama, more severe sentences be pronounced. For such a thing, the Founding Prosecutor has also received the backing of the Appeals Prosecution.

The latter, through a parachute to the Court of Appeals, has proposed to the latter to approve the prosecution's complaint, while to do not refuse complaints from defenders of the accused, reports “Justice bet”

Through an answer to the defenders' complaints, the damaged side in this case, Dritaro Cadoll, has proposed that the accused's complaints be dropped.

All these claims by the parties have been reviewed by a Court of Appeals college Tuesday, composed of judges, Burim Ademi, Havana Haliti and Abdullah Ahmeti.

Agim Ademi and Muharrem Rama are charged that during the time of July 12th, September 12, 2012, with the aim of material gain, had threatened and attacked Dritare Cadoll, forcing the same to act at the expense of his wealth, respectively, to make unfair profits in the amount of 30,000.00 euros, or a car called “BMW X5”, which the car was later supposed to surrender to Pristina Municipal Assembly Chief Sami Hamiti, performing criminal work forcing him to co-ordination.

On this charge, the Constitutional Court in Pristina, on July 5, 2019, had convicted Ademi and Rama of criminal action, the attempted obligation.

Ademi was sentenced by the first rate to nine months in effective prison, while Rama was sentenced to an effective year in prison.

In these sentences, the accused had been set to count even the time spent in detention from September 12th to November 2nd 2012.

Ademi and Rama were also accused of asking for the damage to Kadolli for unfair profit -- the amount of 30,000,00 euros, or type car “, respectively. BMW X5”, looking for the exercise of their improper influence in decision-making an official person who in this case is the Head of the Municipal Assembly in Pristina, Sami Hamiti, to change the status of a land course from “to the green area” to the construction “ ”.

However, the first - degree court had rejected the charge, reasoning that the same had reached the absolute prescription.

Frustrated with the height of the sentences pronounced in the first instance, the prosecution's body has complained at the Appeals, which requires that Adam and Rama be punished more severely.

According to the prosecution's complaint, which was referred to by the reporting judge, Havana Haliti, the sentence pronounced by the first degree does not respond to the degree of social risk.

In addition, according to this complaint, the first degree had overestimated extenuating extenuating circumstances against the accused. For these reasons, the prosecution has demanded that two defendants be pronounced high sentences, which, according to her, would be adequate and would reach the goal of the sentence.

And Ademi's protector, lawyer Besnik Berisha, has linked his defender's sentence to <x0... War”, who said he is being made for the post that Ademi, the one of the president of FFK.

I don't know whether Agim Ademi is such an unfortunate person and there are so many enemies, but as you know, there's a war going on for a post he enjoys and oddly, anonymous letters to judges and colleges come to punish Agim that he's seen as the way someone is looking to come to the helm of Federation”, the lawyer Berisha said.

Berisha said the people who had sent anonymous letters had had the courage to go to the defence attorneys as well and tell them that “that it was good to be punished”, alluding to Adam.

Likewise, according to Berisha, such anonymous letters had gone as head of the Kosovo Judiciary Council, where it was required to prove Adam's condemned act of first degree.

As for the Constitutional Act, Berisha said his device mentioned three countries where criminal acts were committed, Pristina, Kosovo or elsewhere, without specifying where alleged criminal acts were committed, while he said that no single letter mentioned his defence, but, despite that, criminal acts have been named in co-ordination.

Threats and physical attacks for the injured in order to force the same to give a car to Sami Hamiti, Berisha only called them claims, adding that Sami Hamiti himself has never been charged in this case.

Lawyer Berisha's complaint states that crucial facts in the foundation act have been invented and fabricated, while the fact that at the session held on September 13th 2018, the injured has denied in any form that Ademi has been involved in his death threat.

On the other hand, Berisha said that in the Constitutional Act, Ademi has admitted sending a threatening SMS to the injured, but the lawyer said that for such a protection, he was not even questioned during the investigation, the less he would accept such a thing.

Regarding this SMS, the defence in her complaint has stressed that Adam was never proven to be using the phone number from which that SMS was sent, nor is it known who sent the same.

The victim says there are three working meetings with Adam. This (injury) says there is no threat to those meetings, but the threats were beginning later. The injured man did not point to the finger from Agim about the SMS coming from Switzerland”, lawyer Berisha said.

The defence complaint also states that the act of first degree is based on unacceptable evidence, such as a retroactive wiretapping order issued by the tribunal.

The main focus on their complaint, Berisha said it was due to essential violations, where he said, only on the first page of the act could 20 be found.

For those who have tried with conscience in this court, I urge you to manifest yourself with your eyes tied and to decide on these few pages, not for someone else's post and claims”, Berisha said.

As unintelligible and counterintelligible, he has named the first-degree bias device Muharrem Rama's defender, lawyer Ramiz Krasniqi.

According to Krasniqi's complaint, the criminal act's description is not based on administered evidence, while even the actual situation according to it has not been fully confirmed.

Rama's defense complaint also disputes the fact that the first degree several times in its court has singled out certain circumstances as incompatible, but according to lawyer Krasniqi, those very circumstances are controversial since the same are said only by the injured and not by the accused.

In this case, the fact that the injured have been asked 30 thousand euros, or a BMW x5, for changing the destination of a land, according to Krasniqi's complaint, is the fact said only by the injured, while the same one is rejected by the accused.

A physical clash between his defence and the injured, according to Krasniqi, has occurred because of several debts, not on the issue having to act in this case.

The first sentence is enough to break this sentence. There are many alternatives there, where it says, Pristina, Kosovo or elsewhere. Then he says assault and threat. If there's an attack, it consumes the threat. As for the SMS, it says the sender is unknown but says Agim Ademi was either in Switzerland or in America. This is horrible”, the lawyer Krasniqi said in his address before the Apel college.

In this SMS, Krasniqi said it was written in threatening form, among other things, that “say to the fat father...”, thus referring to the person's weight.

Since this SMS had turned to the injured on its own, Krasniqi rejected the fact that the same was addressed to the injured.

Also, Krasniqi said the effort for this criminal offence for what his defense is accused of is not condemned.

The accused themselves were short in their statement, where they only said they back their lawyers' complaints and have nothing to add.

Responding to complaints by defenders of the accused, the injured side in this case, Dritro Caldolli, has demanded that the same be dropped, for according to him, they are unsuccessful.

As for violations allegedly claimed by defenders of the accused, Cadoll has said the same ones were only mentioned formally, but have not argued.

In his response, Cadoll points out and accused Rama physically attacked him, with scratches and broken his tooth, while accused Ademi called him a dangerous person, political figure and head of the FFK, whose purpose, according to Cadoll, had been to Sami Hamiti.

“The SMS referred to me. This is true from EULEX that has come from the accused not from me. On the phone calls, Agim Ademi is the commanding officer of Muharrem Rama since the previous”, Cadoll said in his address.

Otherwise, before Judge Havana Haliti was charged with this case, this subject had been to another judge, but because of some anonymous letters sent to the Court of Appeals, where the magistrate's objectivity was opposed, the same had dropped the case.

The Act against Rama and Ademi has been set up on 14 January 2014, in co-operation with EULEX's Constitutional Prosecutor, with the Constitutional Prosecutor in Pristina.

According to EULEX prosecutor Maerten Groothuisen and Prosecutor Ilaz Beqiri's claims at the first point of the indictment, indictees Ademi and Rama during July 12th 12th, September 12, 2012, with the aim of material gain had threatened and attacked victim Dritro Kadol, forcing the same action to hurt his property, respectively, to make unfair profit in the amount of 30,000.000 euros, or a car called “BMW X5”, which the car was later supposed to surrender to Pristina Municipal Assembly Chief Sami Hamiti, performing criminal work forcing him to co-ordination.

Meanwhile, at the second point of the indictment indicted Ademi and Rama are accused of exercising influence in co-ordination.

According to the indictment, the two indictees had demanded from the injured Kadol the pledge of unfair profit -- the sum of 30,000,00 euros, or type car “respectively. BMW X5”, looking for the exercise of their improper influence in decision-making an official person who in this case is the Head of the Municipal Assembly in Pristina, Sami Hamiti, to change the status of a land course from “to the green area” to the construction “ ”.