Krasniqi shows why they have turned to constitutional for late-income votes

This afternoon an exclusive document has been published, according to him, the coalition. NISMA-AKR-PD has been directed to the Constitutional Court to assess the constitutionality of the Supreme Court's decision on votes by mail that have arrived in Kosovo late.

National Council of Social Democrat Initiative Chairman Jakup Krasniqi has said he has been asked by the Constitutional Court to assess the constitutionality of the Supreme Court's decision on votes by mail that have come late under the Election Law, which has never been declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court.

We consider the Supreme Court's decision to be arbitrary because it interprets Article 3 of protocol 1 as legal and not constitutional norms. That's why we've asked the constitutional court to prove whether the Supreme Court's ruling is arbitrary and unconstitutional”, Krasniqi said of Indexline.

He believes the Constitutional Court will make the decision for provisional measures until making the decision to clarify the constitutionality of the Supreme Court's decision regarding votes by late-income mail.

We recall that against the accession of these votes there have been two major parties in the country, the Democratic League of Kosovo and the Democratic Party of Kosovo.