Why can't the diaspora and Serbian votes be compared

The main argument why it cannot be applied is that since for the diaspora the main issue has been dealing with voters' right to vote, and violating that right by arguments that it may have been violated. In the case of package revenues from Serbia, PZAP has not been dealt with by individual vote and voters' right are or are not valid, but has been dealt with in the way of gathering, transporting and handing over those packages that are estimated to have been contrary to the law.

The PZAP in its decision to eliminate these votes has not addressed voters' right or ballotment, whether voters' right was violated or not, but PZAP has found violations of the law on the way to collect collective, transport by unauthorized persons, gathering to unauthorized places, envelopes without an address, and no place of origin from where they came from until the way they submitted to mail number 6.

It is a huge difference in content in what the Supreme Court has handled and what it is dealing with in votes coming from Serbia.

No human rights convention can be applied in the case of eliminating these packages, because, as noted, they have not been part of addressing the PZAP decision. The way of voting in Kosovo is addressed with the Law on Elections, and PZAP right here has found legal violations that the gathering, transport and surrender has been contrary to the Law on Elections and Law of the CEC.

The voices that try to influence from abroad to be called into human rights conventions are contrary to matter and are unappreciated in concrete cases. /Indesksonline/