Who is attracting <x0 red lines” for Kosovo and Serbia?

In part irreconcilable Tonets between the United States of America and Germany, regarding the way the conflict between Kosovo and Serbia is resolved, may last, but not risk the negotiation process between the two countries -- the process, which is being eased and supported by the European Union -- assessing the connoisseurs of political developments in Kosovo and Serbia.

Germany and Great Britain strongly oppose the concept of changing borders, while the United States of America, as stated several times, support solutions reached by both sides in the conflict.

U.S. Senator and Senate National Security Commission Chairman Ron Jonson, in an interview for Radio Free Europe, has stressed that “German has red lines, already the United States of America, not”.

Former head of the Constitutional Court of Kosovo, Enver Hasani, professor of Law and International Relations, speaking of Radio Free Europe, suggests that if Kosovo and Serbia made border change agreements, without a consensus of Western countries regarding Brussels' epilogue mode of dialogue, such an agreement would produce dangerous consequences.

“If there is no reconciliation between the US and Germany, in the case where France would be undeclared, any agreement between Kosovo and Serbia aimed at changing the current borders, will be accompanied by violence and human tragedy, belonging to, violent population shift south of the Iber River, and in the section of the Presevo Valley”.

“This, I am very sure, will be the inevitable consequence, in the event there is no harmonised action between the two sides of the Atlantic, the US and Germany”, Hasani said, respectively.

But, Serbia's former ambassador to Germany, Milovan Bozinovic, in a conversation with Radio Free Europe that, has expressed the opinion that everything that can follow the epilogue of dialogue in Brussels depends on, as he has called them, great powers.

Whatever is done in Kosovo, even divisions or definitions and others, it is very difficult to produce whatever it is to do if large powers do not want something like this”, Bozinovic said.

On the other hand, for non-resistance of “red lines” over the moat of reaching a legally binding agreement between Kosovo and Serbia, including the change of the border, the presidents of the two countries -- Hashim Thaci, who has named the “border correction” and Aleksandar Vuciq -- who has called “fifism between Serbs and Albanians” -- have also indicated.

That the <x0-line red lines” will not be ignored on topics to be tabled in Brussels' dialogue on June 28th, Kosovo President Thaci had confirmed.

There will be no red lines, as there were from the Contact Group in the case of Vienna talks”, Thaci had said.

Similar attitudes were expressed by his counterpart, Vuciq. But, following German Chancellor Angela Merkel's reaction, who has voiced opposition to changing borders, Vuciq, has said that without major powers, there can be no agreement.

I don't think there's any choice without the United States of America, without Germany or without Russia. It would be important that the great powers -- first of all -- promote talks between Serbs and Albanians”, Vuciq has said, and has added that reaching an agreement would be difficult or almost impossible.

Despite this, the concept of border instability, which a large part of the international community in the first place Germany and Great Britain - has already been found before testing. This is because the United States, such as the greatest power in the world, has shown understanding of solutions reached by both sides in the conflict without excluding the change of borders.

But can a consensus be reached between Western allies, or will the clashes of concepts related to Brussels dialogue epilogue mode be highlighted?

Pavle Jevremovic, former ambassador of Serbia to the United Nations, estimates there can be no major clashes.

“German still remains the key partner in Europe of the United States, especially, given that it is being offered "Brexti”," Jevremovic stressed.

The other former ambassador, Bozinovic, says Germany also wants to maintain partnership with the United States.

Germany's “Tow, to that extent society and politics have been conscious from America that (US President Donald) Tump, probably there is still room for some of his unilateral maneuvers and that something like that will not jeopardise the relationship with Germany”, Bozinovic said.

But, Professor Hasani, suggests that if a consensus of Western leadership is not reached that resolution of the conflict between Kosovo and Serbia is made by changing the border, then implementation of this mode will fail.

“will fail per cent, because there is no reason for the West to be torn down over the Kosovo issue. There is no reason for it to be a cause for contention, because Kosovo is a problem in Western relations with Russians and is not the problem of Western countries. After all, even if there were more absolute concessions, let's assume, more favourable to Russia and Serbia, whatever they want, however, Russian politics in the Middle East, to Iran, to Syria, and to countries where Americans and the West have vital interests, does not significantly change”, Hasani said.

According to him, the implications of the issue of choosing modes for reaching a legally binding agreement between Kosovo and Serbia can now rest, until Macedonia can fix the name issue and thereby approach NATO and on the path to continued stability.

Meanwhile, as he has said, whatever the modalities of resolving the conflict between Kosovo and Serbia, they cannot influence Bosnia and pave the way for the total destruction of the “Dayton Agreement”, because this would cause further implications in Europe and the Euro-Atlantic security architecture.