“resolution without opposition” for dialogue

The opposition, it was not and continues not to be unique in their positions on this resolution, but the common denominator was the request for Parliament to mandate a representative team in talks with Serbia, denying President Hashim Thaci's lead role in the process.

However, this political will expressed through this resolution has not been finalised by vote.

Proposors of this resolution say she is in the Assembly and must proceed for harmonisation and vote.

Dardan Sejdiu, chief of the Social Democrat Party parliamentary group, told REL that resolution is the only way forward so the whole process of dialogue can be in the citizens of political legitimacy.

I believe that at the first meeting of the Parliament, which I believe would have to be quick to vote on this resolution and thus put dialogue on track. I believe that every rational politician and political party has a clear idea that with an opposition that has 58 votes, the whole dialogue can be put on the check-up track of the Parliament. Any escape from putting the dialogue under the control of the Assembly is just how to say the alibi to maintain this kind of dialogue”.

So even the ruling parties and opposition parties who don't vote on this resolution actually want to maintain this kind of dialogue. Nothing more. And this dialogue has neither legitimacy, but has produced enormously harmful results for the country”, Sejdiu said.

He said the Social Democrat Party has invited all MPs of political parties to meet and sit at a table for harmonisation of the resolution, and, as he says, to reach a consensus for dialogue to return to the Assembly.

While MP Xhelal Sfecla from Vetevendosje told Radio Free Europe that the harmful processes that are being done to Kosovo cannot be stopped by resolution. As Sfecla says, everyone knows Hashim Thaci, and according to him, he with resolution cannot stop.

“We know that the Kosovo Assembly has a practice of drawing resolutions. The executive has a practice of violating those resolutions, so I don't know how many harmful processes can be stopped with resolutions. There's no place until September 15th. We can play wordplay as much as you want”, Sfechla said.

Until they [were] in their lot] The PSD] headed for Kadri Veselin of Ramush Haradinaj, passing laws and breaking the blockade of two opposition subjects. Now Thaci, Veselin, and Haradinaj no longer need the Assembly and do not collect the Assembly. Now all democratic ways left to stop Hashim. There is no other way or we can wait for September 15th when the Parliament starts”, Sfechla said.

Even in the Democratic League of Kosovo, MPs say they will not support the Social Democrat Party resolution.

Naser Rugova, LDK deputy, told The REL, a resolution like that of the PSD, would have to come from competent institutions, namely the Government of Kosovo.

The PSD's “ide is delayed and will not bring about concrete pragmatic solutions and consensual spirit to move on. Therefore, we assess that [there must be] elections, political legitimacy by citizens then further steps to building consensus, and as the August 2012 resolution is in effect that with the process of dialogue the country's new prime minister must lead”, Rugova said.

By contrast, with the versions of resolutions submitted by the opposition concerning dialogue with Serbia do not reconcile the ruling parties, especially the Democratic Party of Kosovo and the Alliance for the Future of Kosovo.

They have given support to President Thaci in the leading role in dialogue and have invited the opposition to join the final process of talks with Serbia, through the creation of a comprehensive team and the drafting of a joint platform, as Kosovo's official approach has been to talks with Serbia.

Opposition proposals for dialogue have differences, but their commonity is that dialogue cannot lead Kosovo President Hashim Thaci.