Two ways to annul Ramush Haradinaj's decision to raise salaries

So stated Periscope Albert Krasniqi from the Kosovo Democratic Institute, which considers the Constitutional decision to be unfair.

What it will have to do is to make the Kosovo Assembly itself quickly and pass the law on public officials' salaries, and with legal means to assign these ceilings and co-ficiates, and not to allow them to return to the government's decision, how they see the need to raise salaries or not”, Krasniqi has told Periscope.

However, he expresses sceptical about this initiative that can be undertaken by Kosovo's Parliament deputies, as such a decision on salary increases could, according to him, prevent them in the future if they come to power.

The “Deputes can take legal initiative, the bill already exists, and on that basis with the approval of the Parliament, but it seems to be more of an internal public consumption than that through the political parties or the deputies of the Parliament have a will to prevent the adoption of such a law, because tomorrow they can contact all those who can be in power<1>, it is expressed.

In addition to the decision, Krasniqi says Haradinaj's decision on wage growth could be hampered by the very Anti-Corruption Agency that he had earlier found to be contrary to the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kosovo, specifically Article 424, which determines the conflict situations of interest in cases when top state officials personally participate in an official issue in which she/ai or any member of their family or any judicial person dealing with them have financial interest.

So it's legally, it's now a big story here, and it's been hard to expect a fair trial from these courts that benefit itself from this government decision. So I think this is the only legal way to stop such a decision, while another area is that the Anti-Corruption Agency has brought the case up at the Court, because they have only cosridus that is a conflict of interest, and so that it continues on to other judicial organs with and hostageing the execution”, Krasniqi has declared for Periscope.

Krasniqi considers the Constitutional Court's decision as wrong with the Haradinaj government's decision to raise salaries, but says such a decision has been prevented if the complaining side, in this case the Vetevendosje Movement, had better argued about the violations that have been made, thus enabling the Constitution to issue such a decision.

“It's hard to comment on the Constitutional decision, because now these decisions can no longer be heard with complaint, because they are final decisions, but in my opinion I think it is unfair that the decision made by the Constitutional Court has not been based on fact, but also I think that the demand should have been, the opposition parties that have sent this subject to the Constitutional Court, better prepared, better argued, the violations which those alleged were made with this decision, do not leave space for the Constitutional Court to interpret in such a form of<> he added.

But he does not long for the Court to make any decision against this law for salary increases, as judges and prosecutors benefit from such a decision.

The consequences of this decision are much greater, and it is a conflict of interest for the judges themselves, prosecutors and those of the Constitutional Court to make such a decision, as they too benefit from this” decision, Krasniqi has concluded for Periscope.

Against this decision has come the Vetevendosje Movement, which has also been initiator of the complaint at the Constitutional Court.

The Haradinaj Government's decision to raise wages except that it is a criminal offence is also unconstitutional because it has intervened in the competencies of the Parliament. The non-recognition of the two judges at the Constitutional Court, Gresa Caka-Niman and Almiro Rodriguez”, has stated Hadziu today.

This party's MP, Albulen Haxhiu, has called the Constitutional Court's decision shameful.