25 minutes agoVetevendosje Movement Criticises Constitutional Court for Lack of Courage
Periskopi(8 years ago)
(8 years ago)The Vetevendosje movement has drawn criticism from the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kosovo, following the decision not to address LVV's request for review of the agreement between Kosovo and Montenegro for the signification of the border line, writes Periscopi. The party that Albin Kurti heads says this court has no courage to handle [...]
The party, led by Albin Kurti, says this court has no courage to address this request of the Vetevendosje Movement.
In a issued communiqué, it is said that the Constitutional Court is acting the same as in the case of Thaci-Dacic agreement for the establishment of the majority Serbian Commission Association.
Full communication:
Constitutional Court again dared not address constitutional violations
Kosovo's Constitutional Court, as it had done in 2013 with the Thaci-Dachic Agreement, where the first 6 points before Zajednica -- whose subsequent agreement in 2015 presented it with 23 constitutional violations -- acted even on the case sent over the inside of the border demarcation agreement with Montenegro.
We bring to the attention the citizens of the Republic of Kosovo that the Constitutional Court has not considered the agreement and concluded for it.
So: “TA REFUZAH unanimously the pre-torts' request to review the International Agreement on State Border Demarcation between the Republic of Kosovo and Montenegro, since demand is not a matter of matter in accordance with the Constitution and thus out of the jurisdictional scope of the” Court.
Although in advance it contributed to: “14. On April 18, 2018, after reviewing the report to the reporting judge, the College unanimously recommended that the Court declare the request acceptable and assess the merits of the request. ”
So the court on one side proclaims our request as acceptable, so you know its jurisdiction over the case, to ascertain afterwards that it lacks maternity jurisdiction.
If the Court had no jurisdictional laws of matter then it would have to declare our request as unacceptable. This is described very clearly in the Constitutional Court Order, Article 36, the Criteracy criteria.
Inquiry of V Movement Deputies ENVIDENCE! No review of the Law for ratification was requested, even though the Court has returned answers to this, but actual evidence from the Kosovo state commission is affected by the agreement with Montenegro.
How else does the Constitution defend itself unless such information is taken into account? The Republic of Kosovo and the territory are unfortunately endangered by MPs from the Parliament and the Constitutional Court.
The version that the Constitutional Court of Kosovo does not have jurisdiction over the legislation of international agreements is not enough and does not stop to examine their inside if it directly conflicts with any principle of the Kosovo constitution.
We therefore make clear to the public opinion that the current judges of the Constitutional Court have not announced in accordance with the constitution the Agreement with Montenegro on the issue of demarcation, but have not dared to interpret and judge its contents, thus avoiding the constitutional obligation facing the protection of the republic's territorial integrity.
As with the former “Zyednica”, the Constitutional Court is driving the problem to citizens by failing to correct it. The day the work starts to implement that agreement will be concrete, its unconstitutional materialised. These same judges, as in 2013, joined PDK deputies, with the Initiative within, LDK and AAK to violate our country's constitutionality for little power security. I won't walk you then.
