Eating fast or slow food, what is best for your health? Scientists Answer

Fast eating may be best in the efficiency of time, but it has negative effects on your organism. According to a study in search of type 2 diabetes, eating slowly can help prevent obesity, where researchers have found a close connection with belin and body mass index. “Interventions [...]
According to a study in search of type 2 diabetes, eating slowly can help prevent obesity, where researchers have found a close connection with belin and body mass index.
“Interventions aimed at changing the eating habits, such as initiatives and educational programmes to reduce the speed of the meal, can be useful in preventing obesity and reducing the risk of untransmittable diseases,” writes the authors, reports The Guardian”, broadcast Periscope.
The latest study is not the first to suggest that taking a quiet pace at the dinner table may be helpful: various parts of the job have suggested that those who eat quickly are more likely to be overweight, have acidic rphluks and have metabolic syndrome.
Recent study published in “magazine BMJ Open” by researchers in Japan, looking at data collected through health checks and requests from more than 59, 700 individuals as part of health insurance plans, with data ranging from 2008 to mid 2013.
As part of health control, participants have been tasked with answering seven questions about their lifestyle, including eating food fast, normal, or slow.
The results show that 21.5% of the slow nutrition group were thick, compared to almost 30% of the group at normal speed and 45% of the fast-food group.
While slow eaters had an average body mass of just over 22, normal eaters had an average body mass of 23.5, and fast eaters had an average body mass of about 25, while the waist perimeter was also found to grow at the fastest rate of eating./Periscopi/












