19 minutes agoHow the Judge's Killer (Video) got out of prison
Periskopi(9 years ago)
(9 years ago)If the Court of Cavaja and then that of Durres Appeals had stood up to the prosecution's request, then Fadil Kasemi, the author of his former husband's murder, Judge Fildez Hafizi, would still be behind bars for the first attempt to kill him. At least that's the idea that [...]
At least that's the idea to create when you read the recursive that the Durres Appeals Prosecutor has made at the Supreme Court for changing two decisions of the Cavaja and Durres Appeals Court and increasing the extent of the sentence on Fadil from three to five years in prison.
In the argument part of the recursor, the prosecutor, Ferdinand Elez, names Fadil Kasem and the crime he had consumed in 2015 as highly dangerous and deserving measures of higher sentences and not three-year prison terms, as had established the first two steps of the judiciary.
In fact, at the end of the recursor argument, the prosecutor highlights that the Court in making the verdict should assess the risk of criminal acts as well as the risk of the author, as well as the danger the defendant may face after serving the sentence, or even worse.
However, it seems that the prosecutor's prediction was not seen by the courts of the first two steps, while the Supreme Court did not have the opportunity to examine this recur in time to save the life of Judge Hafizi.
