Kissinger's frightening prediction: Fall of I The SIS leads to the creation of the empire...

Henry Kissinger, diplomat, former minister and national security adviser, also known as foreign policy architect in 1969-1977, has been following developments in the Middle East with concern, the fight of Allied forces and the defeat of the Islamic State.

And what's most troubling him is the overly relaxed decline of self-called “Islamic California”, which, according to him, would create threats for strengthening a “radical Iran” and expanding Tehran territories.

Kissinger warns that choosing an ally in the Middle East or holding one or the other in terms of armed conflicts can bring many problems, writes Respublica.

The thought that your enemy's enemy might be considered your friend” in this case is not worth it. The Middle East affects the world because of ideological instability and certain acts“, Kisinger writes in an article about CapX.

The fight with the Islamic State could serve as an example. Forces that are not linked to the Islamic State, including Iranian Shiites and members of the Sunship leadership of some countries agree on the need for the destruction of the Islamic State.

But which economic unit can we assume will inherit the territory of I SIS? A union coalition? Or will it be a realm of Iranian influence? The answer diverts us because Russia and NATO countries support opposing groups. If the Islamic State lands are occupied by Revolutionary Guard forces and Shiite groups, the result could be the creation of a <x0zone <x0)> territorial” that would extend from Tehran to Beirut and could mark the creation of a Radical Empire of Iran“, Kissinger concludes.